Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] imx6: switch to v4.1

Pushpal Sidhu [2015-10-13 15:57:05]: > -KERNEL_PATCHVER:=3.18 > +KERNEL_PATCHVER:=4.1 Sorry for hijacking this thread, but it's maybe related as I'm preparing support for Toradex Apalis i.MX6 SoM on Ixora base board and I'm wondering if I could just concentrate on 4.1

[OpenWrt-Devel] Patch to add scsi tape to kernel modules

Hi, I would like to submit a patch to add the scsi tape to the kernel modules. For me it's useful because my openwrt device will manage also backup. This is against 15.05 chaos_calmer. Regards, Giuseppe diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/other.mk b/package/kernel/linux/modules/other.mk

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Enable BPF JIT by default?

On 05/11/2015 17:54, Helmut Schaa wrote: > Hi, > > Since lots of architectures now support BPF JIT would it make sense to > enable it by default for all openwrt builds? > Any opinions on that? > > Thanks, > Helmut can you grab some stats so we can compare kernel size on a few targets ? >

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] lua: remove pointless double check of autoload flag

From: Karl Palsson In e2b1433b the autoload param went from being an enumerated type to a simple boolean. Drop the pointless double check of this flag. Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson --- lua/uci.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] include/image.mk: use KERNEL_SUFFIX in Device/Build/initramfs

In case if we're interested in generation of non-binary images (for example if we want images to be valid .elfs - and that's what we want for ARC now) we have to instruct Device/Build/initramfs target to use input file with some extension (in case of ARC it will be essentially .elf). Otherwise

[OpenWrt-Devel] Enable BPF JIT by default?

Hi, Since lots of architectures now support BPF JIT would it make sense to enable it by default for all openwrt builds? Any opinions on that? Thanks, Helmut ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2 v3] linux: add support of Synopsys ARC770-based boards

Hi Jonas, On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 20:22 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Jonas, > > On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 13:06 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Alexey Brodkin > > wrote: > > > + ;; > > > +esac > > > + > > > +uci

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2 v3] linux: add support of Synopsys ARC770-based boards

Hi Alexey, On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Jonas, > > On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 20:22 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >> Hi Jonas, >> >> On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 13:06 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:27 AM,

[OpenWrt-Devel] uci delete doesn't match documentation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to work out _a_ way of ensuring that a UCI config file has a given section type with a given name. While trying to test out the various methods, I've been deleting files from /etc/config, but I was just trying "uci delete config" which is