Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/4] ata: Add DT bindings for the Gemini SATA bridge

On 05/08/2017 02:16 PM, Tom Psyborg wrote: > Is it ever going to be added so this endless spam can end? It's the first iteration of the (S)ATA patchset, and if you are not interested, just ignore the thread. Linus is doing everyone a great favor here by making sure that this platform gets

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2 v2] clk: Add bindings for the Gemini Clock Controller

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> +Example: >> + >> +syscon: syscon@4000 { >> + compatible = "cortina,gemini-syscon", >> "cortina,gemini-clock-controller", >> +"syscon", "simple-mfd"; > > There are no child nodes, so you

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2 v2] reset: Add DT bindings for the Gemini reset controller

Is it ever going to be added so this endless spam can end? On 8 May 2017 at 22:07, Linus Walleij wrote: > This is a simple reset controller in a single 32bit > register. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > ChangeLog v1->v2: > - Move the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2 v2] clk: Add bindings for the Gemini Clock Controller

Is it ever going to be added so this endless spam can end? On 8 May 2017 at 22:11, Linus Walleij wrote: > This adds device tree bindings and a header for the Gemini SoC > Clock Controller. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > ChangeLog

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/4] ata: Add DT bindings for the Gemini SATA bridge

Is it ever going to be added so this endless spam can end? On 8 May 2017 at 22:33, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > wrote: > > On Saturday, May 06, 2017 02:10:51 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2 v2] clk: Add Gemini SoC clock controller

Is it ever going to be added so this endless spam can end? On 8 May 2017 at 22:12, Linus Walleij wrote: > The Cortina Systems Gemini (SL3516/CS3516) has an on-chip clock > controller that derive all clocks from a single crystal, using some > documented and some

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/4] ata: Add DT bindings for the Gemini SATA bridge

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Saturday, May 06, 2017 02:10:51 PM Linus Walleij wrote: >> + Mode 3: ata0 master <-> sata0 >> + ata1 slave <-> sata1 > > ata0 slave? > >> + ata1 master and slave interfaces

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/4] ata: Add DT bindings for Faraday Technology FTIDE010

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Also for all current drivers we just put timing values (or a logic > to calculate them from the standard ATA timings) into the driver > itself and not device tree (as they are based on values are

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2 v2] clk: Add Gemini SoC clock controller

The Cortina Systems Gemini (SL3516/CS3516) has an on-chip clock controller that derive all clocks from a single crystal, using some documented and some undocumented PLLs, half dividers, counters and gates. This is a best attempt to construct a clock driver for the clocks so at least we can gate

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2 v2] reset: Add a Gemini reset controller

The Cortina Systems Gemini reset controller is a simple 32bit register with self-deasserting reset lines. It is accessed using regmap over syscon. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- ChangeLog v1->v2: - Add an explicit GPL license statement. - Move the reset controller to

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2 v2] reset: Add DT bindings for the Gemini reset controller

This is a simple reset controller in a single 32bit register. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- ChangeLog v1->v2: - Move the reset controller node to be the same as the syscon node, no need for a specific child node. - Add an include file with nice #defines. ---

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:19:42PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 8 May 2017, Daniel Engberg wrote: > > > Trac: > > Is it really worth keeping trac at all? What value does it add? Just > > display a page explaining that it's shutdown and forward to OpenWrt? > > There is a lot of

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

Hi, On Mon, 8 May 2017, Daniel Engberg wrote: Trac: Is it really worth keeping trac at all? What value does it add? Just display a page explaining that it's shutdown and forward to OpenWrt? There is a lot of "added value" in the tickets submitted throughout the years, either as comments,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 08/05/17 15:29, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 15:19 +0200, John Crispin wrote: *) mailing list - ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists - announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to unsubscribe if they have privacy issues with this - import the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 2017-05-08 15:43, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: John Crispin writes: Hi, Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to propose and have people vote on. Great to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

John Crispin writes: > Hi, > > Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and > discussed > the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to > propose > and have people vote on. Great to hear progress is being made on this! I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 15:19 +0200, John Crispin wrote: > > *) mailing list > - ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists > - announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to  > unsubscribe if they have privacy issues with this > - import the user DB from the current openwrt

[OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

Hi, Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to propose and have people vote on. *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Factory startup issues since mount_root / libfstools improvements in Chaos Calmer

Hi Rafał, I am still hoping to get confirmation from you on this patch. Is this acceptable for upstreaming? > Hi Rafał, > > > > On 03/29/2017 11:53 AM, Smith, Pieter wrote: > > > > My apologies. I am not able to get mutt working with our corporate > > > > infrastructure. I hope it arrives