Hi!
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:50 PM Adrian Schmutzler
wrote:
>
> In 2011 (!), network setup for nexaira,bc2 was moved to network
> defaults script with a typo so it became b2c:
> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/295e04084c5e106dfac0d9f05ac530de5d0fc07d
I remembered that kernel
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:34 AM Chuanhong Guo wrote:
>
> Since mt76x8an ver1 eco2, SDXC pins can be switched to the
> following pinmap:
> sd_d1 -> PAD_I2S_SDI
> sd_d0 -> PAD_I2S_WS
> sd_cmd -> PAD_I2S_CLK
> sd_d3 -> PAD_I2C_SCLK
> sd_d2 -> PAD_I2C_SD
> sd_clk -> PAD_GPIO0
> sd_wp ->
Removed an eglibc remnant, and while at it, grouped all of the
TOOLCHAIN_PLATFORMs using the same FLAGS together.
Signed-off-by: Eneas U de Queiroz
diff --git a/target/toolchain/files/wrapper.sh
b/target/toolchain/files/wrapper.sh
index 2b760840d8..4452128382 100755
---
This removes package/libs/toolchain/eglibc-files/etc/nsswitch.conf.
Signed-off-by: Eneas U de Queiroz
diff --git a/package/libs/toolchain/eglibc-files/etc/nsswitch.conf
b/package/libs/toolchain/eglibc-files/etc/nsswitch.conf
deleted file mode 100644
index 981c425da6..00
---
I've found some remnants from eglibc, removed by 64da662 in Feb/2016.
While at it, I stumbled upon a case statement with redundant commands,
so I've simplified it as well.
Eneas U de Queiroz (2):
libs/toolchain: remove eglibc remnant file
target/toolchain/files/wrapper.sh: simplify 'case'
In 2011 (!), network setup for nexaira,bc2 was moved to network
defaults script with a typo so it became b2c:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/295e04084c5e106dfac0d9f05ac530de5d0fc07d
This patch just removes the useless entry without replacement,
since it seems to have worked for 8 years
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On
> Behalf Of Chuanhong Guo
> Sent: Montag, 15. Juli 2019 17:28
> To: Adrian Schmutzler
> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 9:29 PM Adrian Schmutzler
wrote:
> can you tell which of the 4 MAC addresses is on the device label, so I can
> add it to my label-mac-address PR?
I guess the router I have is a weird engineering sample. None of the 6
MAC addresses stored in mtd matches the one on
Agreed, we can drop this.
Thanks,
Joe
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 8:14 AM Chuanhong Guo wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 6:58 AM wrote:
> >
> > From: Joe Stefek
> >
> > This change allows cmdline arguments provided by the bootloader to be
> used
> > if no cmdline arguments are provided
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 6:58 AM wrote:
>
> From: Joe Stefek
>
> This change allows cmdline arguments provided by the bootloader to be used
> if no cmdline arguments are provided in the "custom" section of the device
> tree.
I've dropped the entire prom-fixes patch two weeks ago [0] and I
Hi,
can you tell which of the 4 MAC addresses is on the device label, so I can add
it to my label-mac-address PR?
Best
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On
> Behalf Of Chuanhong Guo
> Sent: Montag, 15. Juli 2019 13:54
>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 7:53 PM Chuanhong Guo wrote:
> +_switch {
> +pinctrl-names = "default";
> +pinctrl-0 = <_led_switch>;
> +};
Here's an indentation using 4 spaces. I've fixed it locally.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Specifications:
- SoC: AR9344
- RAM: 128MB
- Flash: 2 * 16MB (MX25L12845)
- Ethernet: 2 * FE LAN & 1 * FE WAN
- WiFi: 2.4G: AR9344 5G: QCA9882
Flash instruction:
1. Hold reset and power up the router
2. Set your IP to 192.168.1.x
3. Open 192.168.1.1 and upload the generated *factory* firmware
Hello Etienne,
On 15.07.19 04:30, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Le dim. 14 juil. 2019 à 04:25, David Bauer a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Etienne,
>>
>> one small remark:
>>
>> On 14.07.19 04:43, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>>> ath79_init_mac(ath79_eth1_data.mac_addr, ath79_mac_base, 0);
14 matches
Mail list logo
