Hi,
> +define Device/netgear_wnr2200-8m
> + $(Device/netgear_wnr2200_common)
> + DEVICE_VARIANT := 8M
> + IMAGE_SIZE := 7808k
> + IMAGES += factory-NA.img
> + IMAGE/factory-NA.img := $$(IMAGE/default) | netgear-dni NA | \
> + check-size (IMAGE_SIZE)
> + SUPPORTED_DEVICES +=
Hi,
> {
> @@ -116,6 +123,8 @@
> ath9k: wifi@0,0 {
> compatible = "pci168c,002b";
> reg = <0x 0 0 0 0>;
> + mtd-mac-address = < 0x0>;
> + mtd-mac-address-increment = <1>;
Sorry if I ask again, but I do not remember whether I asked
Currently AR724x pinmux for register 0x18040028 controls only JTAG disable bit.
This patch adds new DTS settings to control LAN LEDs and CLKs that allow
full software control over these diodes - exactly the same is done by ar71xx
target in device setup phase for many routers (WNR2000v3 for
This patch adds ath79 support for Netgear WNR2000v3.
Router was previously supported by ar71xx target only.
Note: this is a 4_32 device with limited upgrade capabilities.
Specification
=
* Description: Netgear WNR2000 v3
* Loader: U-boot
* SOC: Atheros AR7241 (360 MHz)
* RAM:
This patch adds ath79 support for Netgear WNR2200.
Router was previously supported by ar71xx target only (8 MiB variant).
Netgear WNR2200 has two flash versions - 8MiB sold in EU, US etc. and
16 MiB for Russia and China markets. Apart from flash size both variants
share the same hardware
This patch improves ath79 support for Netgear WNR612v2.
Router functionality becomes identical to ar71xx version.
Changes include:
* software control over LAN LEDs via sysfs
* correct MAC addresses for network interfaces
* correct image size in device definition
* dts: 'keys' renamed to
This patchset enables ath79 target for following Netgear ar724x-based
routers currently supported by ar71xx:
* Netgear WNR1000v2 (tiny, 4_32)
* Netgear WNR2000v3 (tiny, 4_32)
* Netgear WNR2200 (generic, 8_64 and 16_64, USB)
and improves existing support for:
* Netgear WNR612v2 (tiny, 4_32)
For
This patch adds ath79 support for Netgear WNR1000v2.
Router was previously supported by ar71xx target only.
Note: this is a 4_32 device with limited upgrade capabilities.
Specification
=
* Description: Netgear WNR1000 v2
* Loader: U-boot
* SOC: Atheros AR7240 (340 MHz)
* RAM:
Hi,
> Silly question, does 18.6 have the same issue or is this a regression in
> relation to 18.6?
I believe it is a regression but I am not 100% sure yet.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
> On Oct 16, 2019, at 21:54, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Does it impact OpenWrt ? or just some OpenWrt based distributions ?
>> (might influence who need to fix this ;) )
>
> it impacts the usage of the kmod compatibility repositories - apparently
> they're completely ignored by
Hi,
> Does it impact OpenWrt ? or just some OpenWrt based distributions ?
> (might influence who need to fix this ;) )
it impacts the usage of the kmod compatibility repositories - apparently
they're completely ignored by opkg.
This problem was reported in the forum by a user who was unable to
Hi Jo,
Le mer. 16 oct. 2019 à 12:15, Jo-Philipp Wich a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> another blocker:
>
> opkg fails to select the correct provider package in case multiple
> repositories provide the same kmod with different versions and only one
> of the provider satisfied version dependency constraints.
Hi,
another blocker:
opkg fails to select the correct provider package in case multiple
repositories provide the same kmod with different versions and only one
of the provider satisfied version dependency constraints.
Someone needs to debug and fix this.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description:
With each new version of OpenWrt, the size of libstdcpp keeps increasing:
ar71xx target:
247.5 KB - 15.05
365.0 KB - 17.01
371.6 KB - 18.04
The configure file for libstdcpp lists a dual ABI option that is
enabled by default. Maybe this is the reason for the huge jump in
size? Unfortunately, I
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 1:12 AM Paul Oranje wrote:
>
>
>
> > Op 8 okt. 2019, om 14:57 heeft Alberto Bursi
> > het volgende geschreven:
> > ...
> > Yeah it seems these patches are for using the build system with cygwin. I
> > think there should be more explanation on why you want that.
>
> Dear
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:11:34AM +0200, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
> On 11/10/19 12:59, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> > Hi Bjørn,
> >
> > > Or: Start discussing the release blockers here and now. Thanks.
> > 1) Blocker: LuCI master needs to be backported to 19.07
> > Time estimate: 2-3 weeks
> >
Hi,
the OpenWrt project has, after months of deliberation, decided to leave
the SPI and intents to join the Software Freedom Conservancy as future
fiscal sponsor.
Prior to contacting the SFC and SPI we had a discussion among the
contributors which started during the Hamburg meeting.
We
17 matches
Mail list logo
