Hi Martin, Adrian,
Thanks for the info. The device is advertising EEE capabilities, and so
is the adapter on my computer it is connected to:
root@computer:~# ethtool --show-eee eth2
EEE Settings for eth2:
EEE status: enabled - active
Tx LPI: disabled
Supported EEE link modes:
On 01/02/2020 17:25, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
+ bool must_jail;
can we name this requires_jail ?
John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Thanks for clarifying.
How can a user add a usign EdDSA ed25519 key for e.g. a self-hosted package
set?
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/security/release_signatures links to
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/security/keygen which describes how to
generate release signing keys with GPG and
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Hi Adrian,
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020
Hi,
in the device support PR for MikroTik RouterBOARD 922UAGS-5HPacD [1] for ath79,
we have the following in ar71xx mach files [2]:
static struct at803x_platform_data rb922gs_at803x_data = {
.disable_smarteee = 1,
};
Is there an ath79 equivalent available and necessary?
Best
Adrian
Hi Wes,
> It's definitely an issue that the sha256 checksum check was broken.
> But, can someone explain why a person who is MITM'ing ipk downloads
> would change the package and not the checksum?
the repository index files containing the SHA256 checksums are signed using
usign, which is a
Saw this post and thought I'd forward it along here.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22208557
"""
It's definitely an issue that the sha256 checksum check was broken.
But, can someone explain why a person who is MITM'ing ipk downloads
would change the package and not the checksum?
Are there
Since commit b44417c instance: provide error feedback if ujail binary is
missing, worrying log spam of the form "unable to find /sbin/jail ..."
may be encountered.
On systems not configured with jail capabilities the lack of jail binary
is not an error, whilst on systems with jail capabilities
Hello Filip, and all.
Thank you very very much for bringing this on. Sorry for my disappearing
lately, been a little bit busy moving home.
Unfortunately I don't think I have particular findings to reveal regarding
stock FW - I probably would run the original firmware and look at console to
