Hi Nick,
On 10/2/20 5:26 PM, Nick Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please may I request any thoughts and feedback on this proposed patch
> to the hostapd config generation shell script to add a new
> cell_density configuration option?
>
> This would subsequently allow for a LuCI-exposed option to then
Hi,
I just tried sysupgrading a new head build for a Mikrotik 493G device
(ar71xx 19.07.4 initramfs -> ath79 head) however I get the below "not
enough PEBs" UBI failure and panic:
If I sysupgrade from an earlier git build (e.g.
b7a8a5454226f34256c5d76480dda5abb1308395 ath79 initramfs -> ath79
On 07/10/20 15:34, abnoeh wrote:
However, I think you are assuming a RA/DHCP-based WAN connection.
For PPPoE (which is still a thing in a lot of places, including
developing
world, where last mile is often wifi), this won't work that well.
at the end entire reason we need certificate is
On 07/10/20 04:01, Daniel Golle wrote:
Hi Alberto,
Hi Michael,
Hi everyone else,
I don't understand how your argument is related to that pretty nice
suggestion regarding a fairly complex and (unfortunately) relevant
problem.
It is relevant because it's asking how big of a problem it
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
> >>> # For exponential module:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 21:09:26 +0200
Thibaut wrote:
> Ping?
LGTM.
What's in the "$wdata/data_0" file? Is it the BDF?
Best,
lynxis
--
Alexander Couzens
mail: lyn...@fe80.eu
jabber: lyn...@fe80.eu
gpg: 390D CF78 8BF9 AA50 4F8F F1E2 C29E 9DA6 A0DF 8604
pgpbyv_G_1yGj.pgp
Description: OpenPGP
The vDSO is used to accelerate some syscalls. It's working fine on other ARM
targets (e.g. sunxi), let's also enable it on mvebu.
Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra
---
target/linux/mvebu/config-5.4 | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/config-5.4
20. 10. 6. 오전 1:29에 Michael Richardson 이(가) 쓴 글:
abnoeh wrote:
> Openwrt as project get a CA certificate with name constrained to only
> able to sign subdomains of [luci.openwrt.org]. this makes we
> Technically Constrained Subordinate CA, (from let's encrypt or
> digicert),
Hi Daniel!
Am 07.10.20 um 02:24 schrieb Daniel Golle:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:41:03PM +0200, Andre Valentin wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Could someone please take care of this little snippet?
>
> Apart from this no longer applying due to other changes (trivial
> to fix, I'd had it
