Hi Paul,
> I haven’t seen much progress happening regarding bringing the targets lantiq
> or omap to Kernel 5.15. That fact is currently the last blocker for branching
> another release.
> Instead of postponing another release I’d like to mark both targets as
> source-only and do the 23.05
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 05:34:43PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 08:17:04AM +, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 02:30:44PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > > > .hidden __hwcap
> > > > > .long __hwcap-.
> > > > > -1: mflr 4
> > > > > -
> On May 1, 2023, at 6:59 PM, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/05/23 06:40, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>> On Apr 28, 2023, at 11:18 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 12:04:15PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> [snip]
>>>
See above: the radios
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 6:24 AM Peter Naulls wrote:
> > Another impression I have, is that the OpenWrt project is very important
> > for many yet under-resourced.
> > There are some important tasks that would help with the long-term
> > maintenance (e.g. merging of the mtk_nand for > > Does
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 09:34:01AM -0400, Peter Naulls wrote:
> On 5/2/23 09:31, Enrico Mioso wrote:
> > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 09:24:52AM -0400, Peter Naulls wrote:
> > > On 5/2/23 07:26, Enrico Mioso wrote:
>
> > >
> > > > Another impression I have, is that the OpenWrt project is very
> > >
On 5/2/23 09:31, Enrico Mioso wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 09:24:52AM -0400, Peter Naulls wrote:
On 5/2/23 07:26, Enrico Mioso wrote:
Another impression I have, is that the OpenWrt project is very important for
many yet under-resourced.
There are some important tasks that would help
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 09:24:52AM -0400, Peter Naulls wrote:
> On 5/2/23 07:26, Enrico Mioso wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 04:56:36PM -0400, Peter Naulls wrote:
> > > On 5/1/23 16:42, Dave Taht wrote:
> > >
> > > >
>
> > one of the constraints OpenWrt has been placed under, historically,
On 5/2/23 07:26, Enrico Mioso wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 04:56:36PM -0400, Peter Naulls wrote:
On 5/1/23 16:42, Dave Taht wrote:
one of the constraints OpenWrt has been placed under, historically, is the need
to fit in small flash memoris, so fitting some libraries and infrastructure
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 04:56:36PM -0400, Peter Naulls wrote:
> On 5/1/23 16:42, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> >
> > How a ragtag bunch of unincorporated (mostly?) peacenik hippie types
> > can co-exist with devices being built by militaries out of this stuff
> > I have few ideas. I prefer to shrink the
