Re: Objective of OpenWRT/x86?

Hi On 2023-05-03, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 02:45:43AM +0200, Alberto Bursi wrote: > > On 26/04/23 22:17, Elliott Mitchell wrote: [...] > > Then there is the virtualized drivers that were just added to the kernel > > and not properly modulized, maybe it was easier like

Re: Objective of OpenWRT/x86?

On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 06:36:10PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 02:45:43AM +0200, Alberto Bursi wrote: > > > > > > On 26/04/23 22:17, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > > > Well, was a specific objective ever chosen for the x86 version of > > > OpenWRT? > > > > > > I can

Re: Objective of OpenWRT/x86?

On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 02:45:43AM +0200, Alberto Bursi wrote: > > > On 26/04/23 22:17, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > > Well, was a specific objective ever chosen for the x86 version of > > OpenWRT? > > > > I can state my goal/hope for OpenWRT/x86. The *WRT Linux distributions > > were so named

ripe atlas probe openwrt work

https://www.ripe.net/about-us/staff/careers-at-the-ripe-ncc/vacancy/274472 -- Podcast: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7058793910227111937/ Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only

W dniu 03.05.2023 o 20:30, Nick pisze: On 5/3/23 19:23, Aleksander Bajkowski wrote: W dniu 03.05.2023 o 19:11, Nick pisze: On 5/3/23 11:07, Nick wrote: I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to 23.X or fixing

Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only

Am 3. Mai 2023 20:30:11 MESZ schrieb Nick : > >On 5/3/23 19:23, Aleksander Bajkowski wrote: >> >> W dniu 03.05.2023 o 19:11, Nick pisze: >>> On 5/3/23 11:07, Nick wrote: >>> I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it

Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only

On 5/3/23 19:23, Aleksander Bajkowski wrote: W dniu 03.05.2023 o 19:11, Nick pisze: On 5/3/23 11:07, Nick wrote: I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to 23.X or fixing it before the branch. I organized myself

Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only

W dniu 03.05.2023 o 19:11, Nick pisze: On 5/3/23 11:07, Nick wrote: I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to 23.X or fixing it before the branch. I organized myself now a **FRITZ!Box 7320** and **TP Link

Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only

On 5/3/23 11:07, Nick wrote: I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to 23.X or fixing it before the branch. I organized myself now a **FRITZ!Box 7320** and **TP Link TD-W8970**. So if anyone wants me to test

Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only

On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 11:08, Nick wrote: > > I would also love to see a release. It is now already delayed more than > a month [0] (actual branching should be happening end of march). > However, I don't have a strong opinion on this. It's sad that lantiq > targets could be dropped. I will also

Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only

I would also love to see a release. It is now already delayed more than a month [0] (actual branching should be happening end of march). However, I don't have a strong opinion on this. It's sad that lantiq targets could be dropped. I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere

Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only

On 5/3/23 02:53, Alexander 'lynxis' Couzens wrote: what are the problems with lantiq 5.15? There are some issues with the fdb entries: lantiq_gswip driver (e.g.: gswip 1e108000.switch: port 4 failed to add vid 1 to fdb: -22) Ansuel describes here why this is so bad: