Re: A Method of Breaking Git

2023-10-28 Thread Elliott Mitchell
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 07:25:38AM +0200, Stijn Tintel wrote: > On 24/10/2023 15:25, Christian Marangi wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 02:21:35PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > >> Christian Marangi writes: > >> > >>> Anyway I have also found this [1]... if it does actually works, it might > >>> be

Re: A Method of Breaking Git

2023-10-28 Thread Stijn Tintel
On 24/10/2023 15:25, Christian Marangi wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 02:21:35PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: Christian Marangi writes: Anyway I have also found this [1]... if it does actually works, it might be THE solution to our specific problem. Wonder if someone can test it on a sample repos

Re: packages repos: libpcre

2023-10-28 Thread Stijn Tintel
On 28/10/2023 20:03, Paul D wrote: Hi, maybe some housekeeping process is nececssary, but I got this immediately after I did the usually recommended checkout procedures, and have been even after a git pull, every time I run make. The prce package was moved from the base repo to the packages,

packages repos: libpcre

2023-10-28 Thread Paul D
Hi, maybe some housekeeping process is nececssary, but I got this immediately after I did the usually recommended checkout procedures, and have been even after a git pull, every time I run make. Do these packages need bumping to another libpcre version? === WARNING: Makefile 'package/fee

Re: CI/CD failures on non-x86 platforms

2023-10-28 Thread Andrey Jr. Melnikov
Philip Prindeville wrote: > Thought I sent this earlier but I see no trace of it, so here goes again. > Here it is again with the link to the build and the extracted logs from one > of the failing builds: > https://github.com/openwrt/packages/actions/runs/6629645917/job/18009391257?pr=22359 >