On 15.02.2024 18:46, Paul D wrote:
On 2024-02-15 15:42, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 14.02.2024 21:50, Paul D wrote:
Would services not do better to be tracked within uci and its config files in
/etc/config?
Well, it's a part of a mess we have in our init/config code. It was only
last week that
On 2024-02-15 15:42, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 14.02.2024 21:50, Paul D wrote:
Would services not do better to be tracked within uci and its config
files in /etc/config?
Well, it's a part of a mess we have in our init/config code. It was only
last week that Jo was discussing it with Ansuel. In
I recommend avoiding Docker (hub) entirely if possible.
GHCR has been great in my experience. Integrates nicely with GH actions.
On 2024-02-15 13:37, Paul Spooren wrote:
On Feb 15, 2024, at 00:12, Paul D wrote:
Hi,
'sh: missing ]' was my fault. I forgot a '&&' in a hot-plug-script:
[ $DEBUG -gt 0 ] logger -t ...
Regards,
Hartmut
Am Mi., 14. Feb. 2024 um 22:29 Uhr schrieb Paul D :
>
> On 2024-02-13 00:23, Hartmut Birr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I let /etc/init.d/network log some more things by changing:
>
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On Thursday, February 15th, 2024
On 14.02.2024 21:50, Paul D wrote:
Would services not do better to be tracked within uci and its config files in
/etc/config?
Well, it's a part of a mess we have in our init/config code. It was only
last week that Jo was discussing it with Ansuel. In short we have:
1. Packages with no UCI
> On Feb 15, 2024, at 00:12, Paul D wrote:
>
> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/actions/runs/7908507874/job/21587828762?pr=23415
>
> for various platforms
>
> errors:
>
>
> #4 [internal] load metadata for
> docker.io/openwrt/rootfs:i386_pentium-mmx-openwrt-23.05
> #4 ERROR: no match
