Re: OpenWrt Summit 2024 & Battlemesh v16 Announcement

2024-04-11 Thread Denver Gingerich
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:34:08AM +0200, John Crispin wrote: > On 12.04.24 02:19, David Bauer via openwrt-devel wrote: > > can you share which identifier was assigned for OpenWrt? I don't see it > > in the list of the > > IEEE yet. > > The process is still pending. SFC needs to register the OUI

Re: OpenWrt Summit 2024 & Battlemesh v16 Announcement

2024-04-11 Thread John Crispin
On 12.04.24 02:19, David Bauer via openwrt-devel wrote: can you share which identifier was assigned for OpenWrt? I don't see it in the list of the IEEE yet. The process is still pending. SFC needs to register the OUI block as "does business as" to make sure OpenWrt shows up as the name.   

Re: OpenWrt Summit 2024 & Battlemesh v16 Announcement

2024-04-11 Thread David Bauer via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi John, can you share which

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-11 Thread Ivan Ivanov
> Bjørn Mork wrote: "And I consider immutable source-less compiled binary blobs > the absolute worst kind of all binary blobs. > They are impossible to debug and fix, and have exactly no theoretical chance > of ever been replaced by an open source alternative, even in the wettest > libre

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-11 Thread Daniel Golle
Hi Ivan, On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:15:58AM +, Ivan Ivanov wrote: > > there are no Wifi-5+ chips on the market that can run without blobs > > This is true, but at the same time - undoubtedly - some chips are more > likely to be liberated from blobs than the others. Some WiFi chip may > have

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-11 Thread Paul D
On 2024-04-11 10:52, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Ivan Ivanov writes: > >>> SOC: MediaTek MT7981B , Wi-Fi: MediaTek MT7976C >> >> Are these Mediateks capable of working without any binary blobs, at >> least in theory? > > A simple question back to you: Could you please list the wifi chips you > know of

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-11 Thread Bjørn Mork
Ivan Ivanov writes: > BootROM is considered by Free Software Foundation as a part of > hardware And I consider immutable source-less compiled binary blobs the absolute worst kind of all binary blobs. They are impossible to debug and fix, and have exactly no theoretical chance of ever been

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-11 Thread Ivan Ivanov
> there are no Wifi-5+ chips on the market that can run without blobs This is true, but at the same time - undoubtedly - some chips are more likely to be liberated from blobs than the others. Some WiFi chip may have been partially researched (i.e. someone tried to reverse-engineer its binary

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-11 Thread Piotr Dymacz
Hi, On 11.04.2024 10:52, Bjørn Mork wrote: Ivan Ivanov writes: SOC: MediaTek MT7981B , Wi-Fi: MediaTek MT7976C Are these Mediateks capable of working without any binary blobs, at least in theory? A simple question back to you: Could you please list the wifi chips you know of which ether

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-11 Thread Bjørn Mork
Ivan Ivanov writes: >> SOC: MediaTek MT7981B , Wi-Fi: MediaTek MT7976C > > Are these Mediateks capable of working without any binary blobs, at > least in theory? A simple question back to you: Could you please list the wifi chips you know of which ether have a) completely open source firmware,

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-11 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 11.04.24 10:15, Ivan Ivanov wrote: SOC: MediaTek MT7981B , Wi-Fi: MediaTek MT7976C Are these Mediateks capable of working without any binary blobs, at least in theory? (i.e. some existent reverse-engineering research) If not, why have they been chosen in particular? IMHO the "OpenWRT One"

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-11 Thread Ivan Ivanov
> SOC: MediaTek MT7981B , Wi-Fi: MediaTek MT7976C Are these Mediateks capable of working without any binary blobs, at least in theory? (i.e. some existent reverse-engineering research) If not, why have they been chosen in particular? IMHO the "OpenWRT One" project hardware should not be worse

Re: here we are again: real name 'discussion'

2024-04-11 Thread Ivan Ivanov
> My 2 cent on the problem of permitting nick is that if we accept that, > some funny guy might use nickname like "ExtraHardCockSucker" > and we wouldn't have anything to say about it and have to accept > it if the contribution is correct. An immature person who uses such a nickname - is quite

Re: Status of snapshot builds for omap target

2024-04-11 Thread Raylynn Knight via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hiroshi, I’m late responding