If someone would like to search for differences on the pcb, I can make photos
of both pcbs.
Please do, it might be interesting. Also, if they are not identical
(except for ADSL annex) it might be very difficult to find relevant
differences.
It sort of does not make sense to me that the only
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Aleksander Wałęski olewa...@gmail.com wrote:
so why not
use some spare GPIO to pull front-end configuration pin to state in
which it has to be
Actually, it just dawned on me that they can be doing just that. In
the bootloader. This is the only part
Hello Martin,
I've just applied your patch against trunk (r46292) and flashed this
firmware. Unfortunately linked patch did not apply cleanly because
some of your changes were accepted into openwrt trunk. I was able to
fix it locally but I hope you will update your patch for others to
test it. So
it.
We indeed could use some more testing. Preferably not only on
different annexes but different ISPs as well.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Martin Blumenstingl
martin.blumensti...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Aleksander Wałęski olewa...@gmail.com wrote:
Try playing
, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Aleksander Wałęski olewa...@gmail.com
wrote:
add --enable-debug-prints=err to ltq-vdsl-app and change
enable-debug-prints to err in ltq-vdsl-vr9.
...
Additionally, I added --disable-dsl-ceoc to ltq-vdsl-app since CEOC is
disabled in API by default anyway.
Thanks
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Aleksander Wałęski olewa...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe you and Aleksander can try this patch again?
Sure, I'll flash my device with this and let it run for some time to
see if there are any problems.
Ok, I tested your latest patch and everything seems to work
Good news! It works.
Furthermore, I could only get it to work on my line with this new
driver. I tried old driver with 6 different firmwares (VDSL fw
versions: 3.2.8, 3.4.A, 4.6.D, 4.7.9, 6.8.4, 7.4.3). Older ones got me
as far as full_init [0x380] but then process was interrupted and
started all
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Sylwester Petela ssc...@gmail.com wrote:
Getting rid of init script isn't good probably, as original driver in UGW
passes the same commands (mostly) to dsl_control.
I _suspect_ that new firmware is detecting line parameters
automatically. If this is true then
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Martin Blumenstingl
martin.blumensti...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have taken those sources (as they contain the complete build system)
and updated my patch: [1]
The original tarballs can be found here: [2], [3], [4]
It seems that there are two more versions in
Sylwester Petela sscapi at gmail.com writes:
W dniu 2015-05-05 o 09:31, Johannes Berg pisze:
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:28 +0200, Sylwester Petela wrote:
[ 458.772000] DSL[00]: WARNING - Data Path counters are not
supported
for the FE!
That seems pretty harmless - the driver code
10 matches
Mail list logo
