On 02/12/12 18:16, Jiri Slachta wrote:
Dne 2.12.2012 18:42, Christian Gagneraud napsal(a):
Hi,
I'm planning to do a workshop at the Dublin hacker space.
I know that Attitude Adjustment is not yet released, but i wonder if it is
stable enough, or if, instead, I should use Backfire 10.03.1
Hi,
I'm planning to do a workshop at the Dublin hacker space.
I know that Attitude Adjustment is not yet released, but i wonder if it
is stable enough, or if, instead, I should use Backfire 10.03.1.
So far, the list of routers we want to update are:
- Alpha networks R36
- Linksys WRT54G2 V1
-
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Christian Gagneraud,
Embedded systems engineer.
Techworks Marine
1 Harbour road
Dun Laoghaire
Co. Dublin
Ireland
Tel: + 353 (0) 1 236 5990
Web: http://www.techwor
pctlc
CzQAoKVGeJadARlLllV6R7dzsVaQbxmm
=iL/b
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Christian Gagneraud,
Embedded systems engineer.
Techworks Mar
enwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Christian Gagneraud,
Embedded systems engineer.
Techworks Marine
1 H
On 24/04/12 07:52, Claudio Mignanti wrote:
Hi Christian Gagneraud,
Il 23 aprile 2012 14:52, Christian Gagneraud ha scritto:
Hi all,
I've manifested my interest in the AT91 a couple of weeks ago, and nobody
even answer any of my calls.
I would like to work hand in hand with other peoples
r the AT91
target? Maybe we could share some thoughts and ideas.
I have access to the stamp9G20 and the portux9G20, so i can tests these
two boards. I really would like to help and contribute, but it would be
nice if the plans are known in advance.
Regards,
Chris
--
Christian Gagn
This adds a patch to dropbear, that mimic the "ExitOnForwardFailure" of
OpenSSH. This is the easiest way i've found to implement this, just 2 lines
of code that close the connection if the forward fails. Without this dropbear
will never returns and will hang for ever.
Signed-of
These 2 patches add support for port forwarding. Like OpenSSH dropbear support
local and remote port forwarding. This is a very neat feature that allows to
forward (or tunnel) a listening port from one host to another.
There are 2 types of port forwarding: local and remote.
The first patch is to
g.
Signed-off-by: Christian Gagneraud
--- a/package/dropbear/Makefile
+++ b/package/dropbear/Makefile
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ define Package/dropbear/description
endef
define Package/dropbear/conffiles
+/root/.ssh/known_hosts
/etc/dropbear/dropbear_rsa_host_key
/etc/dropbear/dropbear_dss_host_
These 2 patches add support for port forwarding. Like OpenSSH dropbear support
local and remote port forwarding. This is a very neat feature that allows to
forward (or tunnel) a listening port from one host to another.
There are 2 types of port forwarding: local and remote.
The first patch is to
On 04/16/2012 02:31 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
On 05/04/12 16:19, Dave Taht wrote:
I note that I have been tracking the latest gpsds closely (with the new
api)
A problem is that it requires that scons support be added to the
mainline
ONST_INT (WATCH_TIMING);
++#endif
+ SET_CONST_INT (WATCH_DEVICE);
+ SET_CONST_INT (WATCH_NEWSTYLE);
+ SET_CONST_INT (WATCH_OLDSTYLE);
--
1.7.9.1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listi
52) in the same quality. So if you or
someone else wants to maintain some of the platforms none cares about it
will be nice to see some patches for them.
Hauke
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailma
r/linux-at91_tmbbv3/compat-wireless-2012-02-27'
make V=99 -j1 clean-staging
make[3]: Entering directory `.../openwrt/trunk/package/mac80211'
make[3]: Leaving directory `.../openwrt/trunk/package/mac80211'
make[2]: Leaving directory `.../openwrt/trunk/package/mac80211'
make[1]:
-at91_tmbbv3/compat-wireless-2012-02-27/compat/main.o
weird
Chris
On 06/04/12 20:00, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
Hi there,
I'm fighting with a problem of missing kernel symbol.
Basically kstrtou8_from_user is missing, as a consequence mac80211.ko
can't be loaded, and then all the r
p://pastebin.com/gAY5d99M
Could someone shed some light on how to fix this problem? Is it related
with compat-wireless or maybe it's because of my target or configuration?
Any help greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Christian Gagneraud,
Embedded systems engineer.
Techworks Marine
1
=network/connman/connman.git;a=tree;f=doc;hb=HEAD
[3] http://git.kernel.org/?p=network/ofono/ofono.git;a=tree;f=doc;hb=HEAD
--
Christian Gagneraud,
Embedded systems engineer.
Techworks Marine
1 Harbour road
Dun Laoghaire
Co. Dublin
Ireland
Tel: + 353 (0) 1 236 599
On 14/03/12 18:02, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2012-03-14 6:14 PM, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having trouble with my condif-default's.
I have 2 config-default:
target/linux/at91/config-default
target/linux/at91/tmbbv3/config-default
when I do "make target/linux/{clea
d kernel modules via profiles), and now it seems to be broken.
Has anyone had this kind of problems before? Any clue on how to debug
the problem, is there anyway to get more debugging messages out of the
buildroot stuff?
Regards,
Chris
--
Christian Gagneraud,
Embedded systems engineer.
Techw
On 12/03/12 13:11, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working with a board that needs 2 CONFIG_MACH in the kernel config.
in target/linux/at91 I've added a directory stamp9g20evb with the
following config-default file:
--
CONFIG_ARCH_AT9
ut, remarks, ideas
on how to solve this in a clean way?
PS: Attached is the tiny WIP patch for this board.
Thanks,
Chris
--
Christian Gagneraud,
Embedded systems engineer.
Techworks Marine
1 Harbour road
Dun Laoghaire
Co. Dublin
Ireland
Tel: + 353 (0) 1 236 5990
Web: http://www.techworks
summer running
with OpenWRT.
I'd be happy to stay in contact.
BR, Michael
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Christian Gagneraud,
Embedded systems eng
On 07/03/12 16:05, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
Hi there,
As stated in a previous email, I would like to add a couple of boards to
the at91 target platform.
Currently there are 3 boards:
- netus
- flexibility
- tqma9263
I would like to add 3 more boards (all based on an AT91SAM9G20
tainers to
see what they all think it.
Any feedback and remark welcome.
Regards,
Chris
--
Christian Gagneraud,
Embedded systems engineer.
Techworks Marine
1 Harbour road
Dun Laoghaire
Co. Dublin
Ireland
Tel: + 353 (0) 1 236 5990
Web: http://www.te
ctory and
I'm having difficulties to find several "good" candidates to mimic.
I know the at91 already exists, but (sorry in advance to the
maintainers), it doesn't seem to follow the "best practice" to me.
What would be the "best" platforms implementation in t
mmend trying to JTAG
them with a similar router's u-boot and trying to boot over tftp?
Do you have any pointers, tips?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Christian Gagneraud,
Embedded systems engine
On 24/02/12 17:14, thomas.lan...@lantiq.com wrote:
Hello Chris,
we are using NFS most of the time.
Christian Gagneraud wrote on 2012-02-24:
Hi there,
I'm currently trying to add a new device (based on a ATSAM9G20), and
during development I would like to boot it on a NFS root.
Unfortun
nyone has any tricks for using a NFS root?
Especially I would like to:
- Avoid root remounting (or make openwrt aware onf the NFS root)
- Avoid mtd checking and stuff
- Avoid network interface reconfiguration (especially the hotplug call
on eth0 in /etc/rc.d/S10boot)
Regards,
Chris
--
Chri
29 matches
Mail list logo
