On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want to put some comments in your patch, place them below the
---. This way they won't be visible after applying patch with git
am.
Thanks
-by: Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org
---
config/Config-kernel.in | 34 --
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config/Config-kernel.in b/config/Config-kernel.in
index 34e07bd..ae5b3d5 100644
--- a/config/Config-kernel.in
+++ b/config/Config
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
Did you see any real improvements with the snapshot that you used in
your patch?
The main thing for me was presence of get/set/makecontext support.
Definitely agree about the moving target problem.
FWIW, I consider
/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/systemd/systemd-.ebuild?view=markup#l118
Adapted from a patch by Adam Porter.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org
---
config/Config-kernel.in | 34 --
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config/Config
These are all likely to be widely useful in this modern age, but my interest is
primarily in systemd support. :-)
c.f.
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/systemd/systemd-.ebuild?view=markup#l118
Adapted from a patch by Adam Porter.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Waugh j
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:25 AM, John Crispin blo...@openwrt.org wrote:
Please don't just compile test. Right now /usr/lib is not added as a
searchable path for so-libs which renders it pretty much unusable.
That was what the now missing patch 200-add-dl-search-paths.patch dealt
with.
busybox: Minor fix for glibc 2.21 compatibility
Signed-off-by: Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org
---
package/utils/busybox/patches/250-date-k-flag.patch | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/utils/busybox/patches/250-date-k-flag.patch
b/package/utils/busybox
It's the eglibc packaging with a bit of spit-polishing. And testing. :-)
Signed-off-by: Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org
---
config/Config-build.in | 2 +-
include/package-defaults.mk| 2 +-
include/version.mk
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org wrote:
Not content with adding support for uClibc snapshots, I've also tackled
glibc 2.21, as eglibc is no longer an actively maintained project.
Here's the branch I've been working on (which isn't tidied up for merge
btw
Hi all,
Not content with adding support for uClibc snapshots, I've also tackled
glibc 2.21, as eglibc is no longer an actively maintained project.
Here's the branch I've been working on (which isn't tidied up for merge
btw):
https://github.com/jdub/openwrt/commits/glibc
There is one
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Steven Barth cy...@openwrt.org wrote:
It's a bit of a shame it doesn't work with the current default uclibc,
however have you checked if it works with musl out of the box? That being
the other more embedded-friendly solution here.
Looks like libgo in gcc 4.8
it this way to get it ready for feedback.
Thanks,
Jeff
Signed-off-by: Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org
---
toolchain/uClibc/Config.in | 4 +
toolchain/uClibc/Config.version| 4 +
toolchain/uClibc/common.mk | 11 ++
toolchain/uClibc/config
, and 4.9 with an additional fix submitted separately
Only very slightly adapted from Geert-Johan Riemer's work, plus fixes on top.
- https://github.com/GeertJohan/openwrt-go/tree/add-gccgo-and-libgo
- https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2014-January/023214.html
Signed-off-by: Jeff
to build from gcc 4.9. Thus, separate commit / patch.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org
---
toolchain/gcc/final/Makefile | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/toolchain/gcc/final/Makefile b/toolchain/gcc/final/Makefile
index 3fb5ccf..955c92b 100644
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Dirk Neukirchen dirkneukirc...@web.de
wrote:
Its probably a good thing to get easier access to a uclibc variant than
using
- abandoned eglibc = bad (EGLIBC is no longer developed and such goals
are now being addressed directly in GLIBC. )
By the way, I've
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Dirk Neukirchen dirkneukirc...@web.de
wrote:
adding uclibc snapshots maybe other (patched) variants
might improve well some things (quality ? pressure to release new
stable version?)
So we have some options:
1) use uclibc-snapshot.tar.bz2 instead of a
with my ifdef checks). Will keep trying.
Anyway, just popping this here for more feedback if warranted.
Thanks,
Jeff
Signed-off-by: Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org
---
Config.in |4
Config.version|4
common.mk | 10 +
config
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org wrote:
1) use uclibc-snapshot.tar.bz2 instead of a dated, known working version
(though we can't check the md5sum)
2) use uclibc git at a specific revision
3) use uclibc git at head
4) anything I don't know about? uclibc-ng
18 matches
Mail list logo
