Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] mac80211.sh: add support of VHT80 for mesh

I think that it is alright if we solely depends on the wap_supplicant for both open mesh and secured mesh. Chun-Yeow On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Daniel Golle <dan...@makrotopia.org> wrote: > On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 01:01:30AM +0800, Yeoh Chun-Yeow wrote: >> authsae and

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] mac80211.sh: add support of VHT80 for mesh

authsae and wpa_supplicant only trigger if secured mesh. wpa_supplicant should work correctly for VHT80 but don't think authsae. But this patch is intended to allow open mesh to support VHT80. Thanks Chun-Yeow On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Daniel Golle wrote: >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WDS and adhoc support with ath10k

Could someone confirm if WDS and adhoc mode currently don't have support with this driver? adhoc is working but not perfect, such as rate control not working, no HT/VHT rate, and etc. You need to use the firmware version 999.999.0.636. WDS should be working since 4 addresses has fixed by

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] AR9132 based mesh does not start

Hi, Shinoda It could be due to old ath9k chipset filtering issue (broadcast packet is filtered out, such as ARP request) as mentioned in: https://github.com/cozybit/open80211s/wiki/ath9kFilteringIssueFix So modify as follow in ath9k/recv.c and see how: + if

[OpenWrt-Devel] Minstrel Rate Control Statistic missing from Latest Trunk Version

Hi, all Anyone can comment on this? I have not seen any minstrel rate statistic although this rate control algorithm is used for mac80211. Regards, Chun-Yeow ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add Patch in package/mac80211 for AP and Mesh to operate simultaneously in Single Radio

This patch allows the possibility of having the mesh point and AP to be operated simultaneously in one single radio. Previously, mesh point fails to generate the mesh beacon if virtual AP is created for the same radio. Signed-off-by: Chun-Yeow Yeoh yeohchuny...@gmail.com --- Index:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add Patch in package/mac80211 for AP and Mesh to operate simultaneously in Single Radio

Hi, all This is mainly for ath5k. Regards, Chun-Yeow On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Yeoh Chun-Yeow yeohchuny...@gmail.comwrote: This patch allows the possibility of having the mesh point and AP to be operated simultaneously in one single radio. Previously, mesh point fails to generate

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add Patch in package/mac80211 for AP and Mesh to operate simultaneously in Single Radio

Hi, Jonathan, Yes. Regards, Chun-Yeow ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Unfortunately, the driver that you provided not able to detect the switch correctly ADM6996FC PHY detected. I have observed the following: eth0: Atheros AG71xx at 0xb900, irq 4* eth0: PHY overlaps ADM6996, providing fixed PHY 14.* eth0: connected to PHY at ag71xx-mdio:14 [uid=1027,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Hi, Peter, Thanks for you explanation. I have learned some insights on how the PHY/MAC works and MII. FYI, the patch works. I have tested with following /etc/config/network to send out the tagged packet: config 'switch' option 'name' 'eth1' option 'reset' '1' option

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Dear Jonas, After patching the patch, the messages Trying 100/FULL, Trying 10/HALF, Trying 10/HALF disappear during startup. However, even the board is up without Ethernet cable connecting to the LAN port 1 or port 0, the message eth1: link up (100Mbps/Full duplex) is already printed there. The

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Yes, I am using the backfire version and will report my finding once I do it. On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jonas Gorski jonas.gorski+open...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 April 2011 16:18, Yeoh Chun Yeow yeohchuny...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Jonas, UBNT RS has two ports connected to eth1, port 0

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

So the two ports 0 and 1 are attached to the switch chip ports with those numbers? UBNT RS has three port. From the Left is LAN port 1, LAN port 0 and WAN port. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

But it is a curious setup. Did you do it just to test the functionality? Yes, mainly for testing purpose. Good to hear a more usual setup does work. I assume this is with the patch you sent earlier? Yes, using the patch I posted before. In that case the common case where a port has

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Hi, Peter You have any clue which datasheet for FC chip should be referred to. For me, it seems that it is not similar to F chip or not totally same with M chip. Regards, Chun Yeow On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Peter Lebbing pe...@digitalbrains.comwrote: It works as I described on the M

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

with Ethernet cable, you will only see the message eth1: link up (100Mbps/Full duplex) and the port 0 will function properly. Do you know why? Regards, Chun Yeow On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Jonas Gorski jonas.gorski+open...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 April 2011 08:52, Yeoh Chun Yeow yeohchuny...@gmail.com

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Untagged packet receive by port 1 is drop. But VLAN 1 and VLAN 2 tagged packet for port 0 is working perfertly. config 'switch_vlan' option 'device' 'eth1' option 'vlan' '1' option 'vid' '1' option 'ports' '0t 1 5t' config 'switch_vlan' option 'device'

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Hi, Peter and David, I add the following patch and VLAN tagging working fine for UBNT RS: --- ./target/linux/generic-2.6/files/drivers/net/phy/adm6996.c 2011-03-29 16:24:22.869595814 +0800 +++ ./build_dir/linux-ar71xx/linux-2.6.32.27/drivers/net/phy/adm6996.c 2011-04-04 18:32:14.188937710 +0800

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Interesting find, thanks! Can the port still send *untagged* packets as well, if you configure untagged membership? When I wrote the driver, I think I explicitly chose not to set this bit, and it was unneeded for my M chip. Perhaps it means ALWAYS send tagged packets, but I would need to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Just to confirm adm6996fc is similar to adm6996m or adm6996f. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:34 PM, David Goodenough david.goodeno...@linkchoose.co.uk wrote: On Friday 01 April 2011, Peter Lebbing wrote: On 01/04/11 03:27, Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote: Ok I found the script. read-all-adm output

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

/37 20:59, Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote: It seems that ADM6996FC is different from ADM6996M. How to ensure the port get tagged? Is this by simply modifying Configuration register Bit 4? It's a lot more involved on the M model. A whole bunch of bits need to be changed before it works as one would

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

David, Can you send me the datasheet. Thanks On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:34 PM, David Goodenough david.goodeno...@linkchoose.co.uk wrote: On Friday 01 April 2011, Peter Lebbing wrote: On 01/04/11 03:27, Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote: Ok I found the script. read-all-adm output attach

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

It seems that ADM6996FC is different from ADM6996M. How to ensure the port get tagged? Is this by simply modifying Configuration register Bit 4? On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Yeoh Chun Yeow yeohchuny...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Yeoh Chun Yeow yeohchuny

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

. David On Thursday 31 March 2011, Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote: It seems that ADM6996FC is different from ADM6996M. How to ensure the port get tagged? Is this by simply modifying Configuration register Bit 4? On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Yeoh Chun Yeow yeohchuny...@gmail.comwrote

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Please send me the script that you mentioned I have run the following: :~# swconfig dev eth1 vlan 2 set ports '0 1 2 3t 4t 5t' :~# swconfig dev eth1 get addr 0 :~# swconfig dev eth1 get data 65535 dmesg Infineon ADM6996 ag71xx-mdio:10: set_pvid port 0 vlan 2 Infineon ADM6996 ag71xx-mdio:10:

[OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Dear all, I am able to get the patch works by adding the following in mach-ubnt.c: ar71xx_eth1_data.phy_mask = UBNT_RS_LAN_PHYMASK However, there is two issues here: 1. RouterStation has two ports on ETH1. One port can only be activated after the other port is connected with cable. If this port

[OpenWrt-Devel] 802.1Q VLAN support for Infineon ADM6996 switch chip for UBNT RouterStation

Dear all, Any one has tried the patch from Peter Lebbing on VLAN tag on UBNT RouterStation platform and get it work properly. Regards, Chun Yeow ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org