Hi all,
I was discussing the changes to preinit, mount_root, and and firstboot
that I am working on, with Jo (xMff), specifically to ask where he
thought I should put code that was common to the reworked mount_root and
firstboot.
In that discussion we came to the conclusion that non-config files
What do the rest of you think, of making the /lib move for a)
functions.sh and b) preinit?
100% agreement. You'll probably want to keep compatibility symlinks in
place, tho (and maybe /etc/functions.sh won't be a symlink but a file
that loads all the files into which functions.sh has been
What do the rest of you think, of making the /lib move for a)
functions.sh and b) preinit?
Sounds like a good idea to me. Might as well move /etc/init.d and
rc.common while we're at it - but not without compatibility symlinks,
both for users and for applications that rely on the old layout.
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 13:10, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
I was discussing the changes to preinit, mount_root, and and firstboot
that I am working on, with Jo (xMff), specifically to ask where he
thought I should put code that was common to the reworked mount_root and
firstboot.
In that
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 15:06 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
What do the rest of you think, of making the /lib move for a)
functions.sh and b) preinit?
Sounds like a good idea to me. Might as well move /etc/init.d and
rc.common while we're at it - but not without compatibility symlinks,
both
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 15:06, Stefan Monnier wrote:
What do the rest of you think, of making the /lib move for a)
functions.sh and b) preinit?
Sounds like a good idea to me. Might as well move /etc/init.d and
rc.common while we're at it - but not without compatibility symlinks,
both for
On 2010-01-13 9:16 PM, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 15:06, Stefan Monnier wrote:
What do the rest of you think, of making the /lib move for a)
functions.sh and b) preinit?
Sounds like a good idea to me. Might as well move /etc/init.d and
rc.common while we're at it - but
