Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-05-29 09:03, John Crispin wrote: >> (resend, this time as plain text) >> >> Hi, >> >> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments >> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

On Tue, 30 May 2017 at 08:38, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-05-29 09:03, John Crispin wrote: > > (resend, this time as plain text) > > > > Hi, > > > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > > people made into it, if anything is missing let me

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

On 2017-05-29 09:03, John Crispin wrote: > (resend, this time as plain text) > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber > that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

*) rules - owrt will adopt the lede rules and voting system ACK from me aswell. *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people said they did not care - as the last vote had a 100% ACK for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 24/05/17 10:13, Paul Oranje wrote: Who are/will be entitled to an [IRC] project cloak ? Paul people with voting rights and probably also regular contributors ... that is however unrelated to the remerge discussion and would fall under the normal voting system Op 22 mei 2017, om 19:11

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 23/05/17 22:42, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: Hi, here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. John . *) SPI - nominate a new liaison team (imre and

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. > > > John . > *) SPI > - nominate a new liaison team (imre and john offer to do this, if anyone

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

Hi, On 2017-05-22 03:10, John Crispin wrote: On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote: On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people said they did

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

John Crispin writes: > the lede rules that will become the new owrt rules. You may want to mention this fact in the merge proposal itself. What would happen to the rules was one of the points that was unclear in the first round, I believe... :) -Toke

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 22/05/17 11:39, Vincenzo Romano wrote: I also agree to everything. With am extra point. 2017-05-22 11:18 GMT+02:00 tapper : *) SPI - nominate a new liaison team (imre and john offer to do this, if anyone else is interested let us know) - inform SPI of the new

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote: On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote: *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people said they did not care - as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

Well hello there, On 2017-05-11 12:53, Stijn Segers wrote: While, like most people, I'm happy progress has been made towards a re-merge, there still seems quite some passive-agressive behaviour present coming from certain people championing OpenWrt [1] - which, from where I stand, seemed one

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

Of course you only see you numbered your notes the wrong way *after* you send your e-mail... The second [3] and [4] should have been [5] and [6] (see inline). Stijn Segers schreef op 2017-05-11 12:53: Hey guys, This might be a bit lengthy, but I should get this off my chest. I feel people

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 05/09/2017 10:12 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:50 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 09/05/17 09:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> >>> On 8 May 2017 at 15:19, John Crispin wrote: *) domain - transfer owner ship to SPI for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] Im > Auftrag von Imre Kaloz > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2017 11:36 > > On 2017-05-09 18:29, Philip Prindeville wrote: > > > > > I’d like to suggest one more action item to this list if

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 2017-05-09 18:29, Philip Prindeville wrote: I’d like to suggest one more action item to this list if I can. It would be handy to have a single database for user authentication/identification for submitting bugs, editing the Wiki, etc. Previously there were too many places where you had

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 2017-05-09 18:29, Philip Prindeville wrote: > I’d like to suggest one more action item to this list if I can. It > would be handy to have a single database for user > authentication/identification for submitting bugs, editing the Wiki, etc. > > Previously there were too many places where you

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

> On May 8, 2017, at 7:19 AM, John Crispin wrote: > > Hi, > > Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and > discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would > like to propose and have people vote on. > > *) branding > -

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

> On May 8, 2017, at 7:29 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 15:19 +0200, John Crispin wrote: >> >> *) mailing list >> - ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists >> - announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to >> unsubscribe

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:19:42PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 8 May 2017, Daniel Engberg wrote: > > > Trac: > > Is it really worth keeping trac at all? What value does it add? Just > > display a page explaining that it's shutdown and forward to OpenWrt? > > There is a lot of

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

Hi, On Mon, 8 May 2017, Daniel Engberg wrote: Trac: Is it really worth keeping trac at all? What value does it add? Just display a page explaining that it's shutdown and forward to OpenWrt? There is a lot of "added value" in the tickets submitted throughout the years, either as comments,