> >ubnt nano-m-xw success! Laptop on main port (lan) cat5 on secondary
> >port to home network-internet (wan).Laptop can browse internet on
> >first boot. Both Ethernet ports functional.
>
> Hi,
>
> thank you for testing, could you please give me your Tested-by so I can add
> it?
>
On December 8, 2018 6:08:47 PM UTC, Joe Ayers wrote:
>
>ubnt nano-m-xw success! Laptop on main port (lan) cat5 on secondary
>port to home network-internet (wan).Laptop can browse internet on
>first boot. Both Ethernet ports functional.
Hi,
thank you for testing, could you please give me
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:48 AM Petr Štetiar wrote:
>
> could you please retest it on your M5 and tell me if it's better now? Commit
> history of my wip/nanostation-m-xw branch should look like this now:
>
> 6db71cf WIP: ath79: Add support for Ubiquiti Nanostation M (XW)
> a947035 ath79: ag71xx:
Petr Štetiar [2018-11-20 00:28:50]:
Hi Joe,
> > cd openwrt.git
> > git remote add github-ynezz https://github.com/ynezz/openwrt.git
> > git fetch github-ynezz
> > git checkout -b nanostation-m-xw github-ynezz/wip/nanostation-m-xw
> > echo -e
> >
Nanostation M5 XW testing results on ath79
>
> > [0.444718] libphy: Fixed MDIO Bus: probed
> > [0.786402] libphy: ag71xx_mdio: probed
> > [0.793193] switch0: Atheros AR8236 rev. 1 switch registered on
> > mdio-bus.0
> > [1.137115] ag71xx 1900.eth: connected to PHY at
Petr Štetiar [2018-11-18 01:02:34]:
Hi Joe,
> cd openwrt.git
> git remote add github-ynezz https://github.com/ynezz/openwrt.git
> git fetch github-ynezz
> git checkout -b nanostation-m-xw github-ynezz/wip/nanostation-m-xw
> echo -e
>
Joe Ayers [2018-11-18 08:37:54]:
> On the serial console, could see why your node is not going into tftp
> server mode or if other reason?
I simply couldn't see anything, it has never interrupted the booting process.
According to your information I've simply checked the functionality of the
>> if I haven't overlooked it, the patch does not provide a "factory" Image as
>> in ar71xx, at least according to "Flashing instructions".
> if I parse this correctly, then my answer is, that I simply didn't included
> instructions for flashing of factory image as it wasn't possible at that time,
testing update for Nanostation M5 XW:
indeed this entry is needed in 02_network:
ubnt,nano-m-xw)
ucidef_add_switch "switch0" \
"0@eth0" "5:lan" "1:wan"
;;
On a laptop on the LAN, I observe frames egressing (arp requests) and
TX
Lech Perczak [2018-11-18 21:34:53]:
> Can I add Tested-By tag to my patch? :)
Tested-by: Petr Štetiar (tested on ar71xx/ath79 with
bullet-m-xw)
-- ynezz
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Hello Petr,
W dniu 2018-11-18 o 21:18, Petr Štetiar pisze:
Lech Perczak [2018-11-18 17:21:46]:
well as checking if rssileds package was indeed pulled in via "opkg list
Somehow the rssileds package wasn't enabled even if I've selected building of
nano-xm-w via menu config. I've deleted the
Lech Perczak [2018-11-18 17:21:46]:
> well as checking if rssileds package was indeed pulled in via "opkg list
Somehow the rssileds package wasn't enabled even if I've selected building of
nano-xm-w via menu config. I've deleted the .config and created a new one,
then it was selected, weird.
> I recall that ar71xx had a hack for freezing Ethernet ports on XW
> boards. This may need to be ported also. I need to dig into the sources
> for details.
This was all due to the unique architecture by Ubiquiti with an
external chip used and not the AR93xx onchip Ethernet. In CC, the
8035
> > root@AE6XE-NSM5XW-QTH:~# cat /etc/openwrt_version
> > r7258-5eb055306f
>
> I was asking for airOS version, so it should rather be `cat /etc/version`. I
> don't have /etc/openwrt_version in my airOS v6.1.7 system.
>
I was running openwrt 3.18.06.1 prior to tftp'ing this test image. It
Hi Petr,
Thanks for testing!
W dniu 2018-11-18 o 17:05, Petr Štetiar pisze:
Lech Perczak [2018-11-18 01:29:08]:
Hi,
Actually, I meant building and testing on ar71xx target instead of ath79.
But anyway, you might include this little change in your patch,
because when I added this support,
Lech Perczak [2018-11-18 01:29:08]:
Hi,
> Actually, I meant building and testing on ar71xx target instead of ath79.
> But anyway, you might include this little change in your patch,
> because when I added this support, XW wasn't ported to ath79 yet. Therefore
> the LED configuration didn't need
Hi Petr, Joe,
W dniu 2018-11-18 o 10:03, Petr Štetiar pisze:
Joe Ayers [2018-11-17 18:40:56]:
Hm, I'm really wondering what version of airOS do you've on your devices, that
the TFTP recovery method works for you.
root@AE6XE-NSM5XW-QTH:~# cat /etc/openwrt_version
r7258-5eb055306f
I was
Joe Ayers [2018-11-17 18:40:56]:
> > Hm, I'm really wondering what version of airOS do you've on your devices,
> > that
> > the TFTP recovery method works for you.
>
> root@AE6XE-NSM5XW-QTH:~# cat /etc/openwrt_version
> r7258-5eb055306f
I was asking for airOS version, so it should rather be
> > I have a NanoStation M5 XW (and can get access to a NS M2 XW).I
> > can test. What's the reference to build and test?
>
> thanks for the help with testing, something like this could work:
>
> cd openwrt.git
> git remote add github-ynezz https://github.com/ynezz/openwrt.git
> git fetch
Hello Petr,
W dniu 2018-11-17 o 14:04, Petr Štetiar pisze:
Lech Perczak [2018-11-17 10:25:30]:
ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi, and then secondary ethernet and USB only enabled in
respective .dts files. It'd be even better if someone on the list had a
Rocket M XW to test, as it is the fullest variant.
Joe Ayers [2018-11-17 06:11:11]:
Hi Joe,
> I have a NanoStation M5 XW (and can get access to a NS M2 XW).I
> can test. What's the reference to build and test?
thanks for the help with testing, something like this could work:
cd openwrt.git
git remote add github-ynezz
> For example, Nanostation is basically a Bullet with extra ethernet port,
> and
> Rocket is a Bullet with added USB port.
> >>> Ah, thanks for explanation.
> >> You're welcome
> It'd be great if support for all of them could be included in
> ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi, and then
W dniu 2018-11-17 o 15:11, Joe Ayers pisze:
For example, Nanostation is basically a Bullet with extra ethernet port, and
Rocket is a Bullet with added USB port.
Ah, thanks for explanation.
You're welcome
It'd be great if support for all of them could be included in
ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi, and
> >> For example, Nanostation is basically a Bullet with extra ethernet port,
> >> and
> >> Rocket is a Bullet with added USB port.
> > Ah, thanks for explanation.
> You're welcome
> >
> >> It'd be great if support for all of them could be included in
> >> ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi, and then secondary
Lech Perczak [2018-11-17 10:25:30]:
> > > ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi, and then secondary ethernet and USB only enabled in
> > > respective .dts files. It'd be even better if someone on the list had a
> > > Rocket M XW to test, as it is the fullest variant.
>
> > Hm, so maybe I should move definition of
Lech Perczak [2018-11-17 10:28:20]:
> Wasn't this possible with downgrading to AirOS 5 first just as it is done
> for XM series? Please take a look for instructions for them, on XM the
> procedure is quite easy.
I was using the same downgrade trick on other older UBNT devices as well, and
I
Hi Petr, Adrian,
W dniu 2018-11-17 o 07:44, Petr Štetiar pisze:
m...@adrianschmutzler.de [2018-11-16 19:15:41]:
Hi Adrian,
if I haven't overlooked it, the patch does not provide a "factory" Image as
in ar71xx, at least according to "Flashing instructions".
if I parse this correctly, then
W dniu 2018-11-17 o 07:33, Petr Štetiar pisze:
Lech Perczak [2018-11-16 18:46:40]:
Hi,
For example, Nanostation is basically a Bullet with extra ethernet port, and
Rocket is a Bullet with added USB port.
Ah, thanks for explanation.
You're welcome
It'd be great if support for all of them
m...@adrianschmutzler.de [2018-11-16 19:15:41]:
Hi Adrian,
> if I haven't overlooked it, the patch does not provide a "factory" Image as
> in ar71xx, at least according to "Flashing instructions".
if I parse this correctly, then my answer is, that I simply didn't included
instructions for
Lech Perczak [2018-11-16 18:46:40]:
Hi,
> For example, Nanostation is basically a Bullet with extra ethernet port, and
> Rocket is a Bullet with added USB port.
Ah, thanks for explanation.
> It'd be great if support for all of them could be included in
> ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi, and then
; -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Lech Perczak
> Sent: Freitag, 16. November 2018 18:47
> To: Petr Štetiar
> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: Add support for Ub
Hi,
W dniu 2018-11-16 o 16:13, Petr Štetiar pisze:
Lech Perczak [2018-11-15 19:30:00]:
Hi,
Just a couple of remarks inline, based on my knowledge about XM series.
thanks for the review!
+ ubnt,bullet-m2hp|\
I'd call it ubnt,bullet-m-xw, as this patch will very likely support
Lech Perczak [2018-11-15 19:30:00]:
Hi,
> Just a couple of remarks inline, based on my knowledge about XM series.
thanks for the review!
> > + ubnt,bullet-m2hp|\
>
> I'd call it ubnt,bullet-m-xw, as this patch will very likely support
> Bullet-M5HP also.
Ok
> > + link4 {
> > +
Hi,
Just a couple of remarks inline, based on my knowledge about XM series.
W dniu 2018-11-15 o 13:32, Petr Štetiar pisze:
From: Petr Štetiar
CPU: AR9342 SoC
RAM: 64 MB DDR2
Flash:8 MB NOR SPI
Ports: 100 MBit (24V PoE in)
WLAN: 2.4 GHz
UART: 1 UART on PCB marked as J1 with
From: Petr Štetiar
CPU: AR9342 SoC
RAM: 64 MB DDR2
Flash:8 MB NOR SPI
Ports: 100 MBit (24V PoE in)
WLAN: 2.4 GHz
UART: 1 UART on PCB marked as J1 with 115200 8N1 config
LEDs: Power, Ethernet, WPS, USB, RF 2.4G, RF 5G
Buttons:Reset
UART connection details
35 matches
Mail list logo
