John Crispin j...@phrozen.org [2013-02-28 09:56:53]:
i will push the script fix to BB later today.
Thanks!
-- ynezz
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 27/02/13 21:39, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Jo-Philipp Wichx...@subsignal.org [2012-11-26 20:47:45]:
I see this patch as an immediate fix for AA. I don't know, if it's
ok to introduce such a generalization into the AA. It's up to you
guys, I'll try to help as much as I can. Thanks.
Sure, the
* Petr Štetiar yn...@true.cz [28.02.2013 09:46]:
and tried it on my Carambola (rt3350):
wlan0 C4:93:00:11:01:88
wlan0-1 C6:93:00:11:01:89
Please note that upper byte C4/C6 which renders the wlan0 bssid unaccessible.
Correct and working MAC should start with C4. Thanks.
On 28/02/13 10:47, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
* Petr Štetiaryn...@true.cz [28.02.2013 09:46]:
and tried it on my Carambola (rt3350):
wlan0 C4:93:00:11:01:88
wlan0-1 C6:93:00:11:01:89
Please note that upper byte C4/C6 which renders the wlan0 bssid unaccessible.
Correct and
* John Crispin j...@phrozen.org [28.02.2013 10:50]:
o'rly ? on rt wisoc ? i think not
no, other platform - i'am confused, that this a
hardware issue?! if so, sorry for the noise...
bye, bastian
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Jo-Philipp Wich x...@subsignal.org [2012-11-26 20:47:45]:
I see this patch as an immediate fix for AA. I don't know, if it's
ok to introduce such a generalization into the AA. It's up to you
guys, I'll try to help as much as I can. Thanks.
Sure, the help is appreciated.
Hi again,
I've
As rt2800 hw can only be configured to mask the last three bits of the
programmed MAC addresses, we can't change first byte of the MAC - otherwise it
doesn't work. More information about this issue [1].
Should fix #12133.
1. http://marc.info/?l=linux-wirelessm=135387062429809w=2
Thanks to Paul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
+is_not_rt2800() { + grep -E 'Ralink (RT3050|RT3052|RT3350|RT3352)'
/proc/cpuinfo /dev/null \ + return 1 || return 0 +}
This can be simplified to:
is_not_rt2800() {
grep -sqE 'Ralink (RT3050|RT3052|RT3350|RT3352)'
Jo-Philipp Wich x...@subsignal.org [2012-11-26 19:53:52]:
This can be simplified to:
is_not_rt2800() {
grep -sqE 'Ralink (RT3050|RT3052|RT3350|RT3352)' /proc/cpuinfo
}
But then it should be changed to is_rt2800(), right?
Since Daniel Dickinson recently posted a series of patches to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
But then it should be changed to is_rt2800(), right?
Correct, I overlooked the inverted logic.
Sounds good, there's plan to add this into the AA? I was personally
thinking about such a generalization myself.
No, it will most definitely not
10 matches
Mail list logo
