Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] treewide: dts: Unify naming of gpio-keys nodes

2019-02-05 Thread Christian Lamparter
Hello, I've just pushed the remaining patches. Except for lantiq. But these are moving along in Mathias Kresin' staging tree: Thanks, Christian

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] treewide: dts: Unify naming of gpio-keys nodes

2019-01-22 Thread Petr Štetiar
Christian Lamparter [2019-01-22 17:54:13]: Hi, > The at91, apm821xx, ipq40xx, ipq806x, layerscape and oxnas are probably > ready to be merged. a lot of additional work, thanks! > The situation with ramips, ath79 and lantiq is a bit more complicated: >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] treewide: dts: Unify naming of gpio-keys nodes

2019-01-22 Thread Christian Lamparter
On Thursday, January 3, 2019 10:39:08 PM CET Petr Štetiar wrote: > Christian Lamparter [2019-01-03 18:27:40]: > > > I would try to split up the patch into multiple patches so that > > each maintainer has the chance to act on just his own turf. > > I don't want to waste more of my time on such

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] treewide: dts: Unify naming of gpio-keys nodes

2019-01-03 Thread Christian Lamparter
On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 6:07:40 PM CET Petr Štetiar wrote: > Christian Lamparter [2018-12-31 17:41:34]: > > > I hope you know what you are up against because unless you also do the > > changes > > upstream this will happen again and again. :\ / :) > > My plan is to first wait for comments

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] treewide: dts: Unify naming of gpio-keys nodes

2019-01-01 Thread Petr Štetiar
Christian Lamparter [2018-12-31 17:41:34]: > I hope you know what you are up against because unless you also do the changes > upstream this will happen again and again. :\ / :) My plan is to first wait for comments here, see if it gets merged eventualy and then start poking upstream. I still

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] treewide: dts: Unify naming of gpio-keys nodes

2018-12-31 Thread Christian Lamparter
On Sunday, December 30, 2018 12:17:25 PM CET Petr Štetiar wrote: > In DTS Checklist[1] we're now demanding proper generic node names, as > the name of a node should reflect the function of the device and use > generic name for that[2]. Everybody seems to be copy from DTS > files available in the