On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 00:39, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 12, 2020, at 7:08 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 03:21, Philip Prindeville
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Philip Prindeville
> >>
> >> If the start_time > stop_time on a rule, then the --contiguous arg
> On May 12, 2020, at 7:08 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 03:21, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>>
>> From: Philip Prindeville
>>
>> If the start_time > stop_time on a rule, then the --contiguous arg
>> should be included in the rule.
>
> It seems that start_time >=
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 03:21, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
>
> From: Philip Prindeville
>
> If the start_time > stop_time on a rule, then the --contiguous arg
> should be included in the rule.
It seems that start_time >= stop_time has its defined meaning in
xt_time module. Better add another uci
Should I open a PR or is this the correct way to get a review for firewall3?
Thanks
> On May 1, 2020, at 1:21 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
> From: Philip Prindeville
>
> If the start_time > stop_time on a rule, then the --contiguous arg
> should be included in the rule.
>
>
From: Philip Prindeville
If the start_time > stop_time on a rule, then the --contiguous arg
should be included in the rule.
Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville
---
iptables.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/iptables.c b/iptables.c
index
