Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] ath79: Add GL.iNet AR-300M-Lite

2019-03-01 Thread Jeff Kletsky
(Resend using git-send-email to resolve mangling) Update of patch based on feedback that the variants have different colors for the LEDs. Confirmed with OEM that they are not all green, in contrast to the presently mach file in OEM's source. This patch is now self-contained. Patch [2/2] in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] ath79: Add GL.iNet AR-300M-Lite

2019-03-01 Thread Jeff Kletsky
Update of patch based on feedback that the variants have different colors for the LEDs. Confirmed with OEM that they are not all green, in contrast to the presently mach file in OEM's source. This patch is now self-contained. Patch [2/2] in this series should be withdrawn. See also

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] ath79: Add GL.iNet AR-300M-Lite

2019-02-17 Thread Jeff Kletsky
On 2/16/19 12:03 PM, w...@reboot.ch wrote: Hello Jeff, I did try your suggested change but really not sure to have done that correctly, this is what lsusb shows while I have a wifi usb dongle connected (also tried with memory stick): Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] ath79: Add GL.iNet AR-300M-Lite

2019-02-04 Thread Jeff Kletsky
On 2/4/19 4:20 AM, w...@reboot.ch wrote: Hello Jeff, thanks for adding GL.iNet AR-300M-Lite ! I can't test it as it's not yet merged into master I think, I'm currently using GL.iNet AR-300M settings with a GL.iNet AR-300M-Lite box and USB is not working, lsusb shows nothing. Wondering if it's

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] ath79: Add GL.iNet AR-300M-Lite

2019-01-27 Thread Jeff Kletsky
Resend as per M. Kreskin From 2e3b968813e3862c5319c6c360781b0921d4b413 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Kletsky Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 14:07:30 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ath79: Add GL.iNet AR-300M-Lite AR300M-Lite is single-Ethernet variant of the AR300M series Its eth0 would otherwise be