Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] mac80211/rt2x00: differentiate rf_vals for ht20/ht40

2012-11-12 Thread Daniel Golle
Hi! Thank you for clarifying this one! That was probably a life saver. I should have google'd the acronym XTAL=Crystal... So: I'm wondering why it's done in SwitchChannel and not during initialization in the vendor driver (as it won't ever change in run-time, if I got it right now...) If this

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] mac80211/rt2x00: differentiate rf_vals for ht20/ht40

2012-11-12 Thread Gabor Juhos
2012.11.12. 10:16 keltezéssel, Daniel Golle írta: Hi! Thank you for clarifying this one! That was probably a life saver. I should have google'd the acronym XTAL=Crystal... So: I'm wondering why it's done in SwitchChannel and not during initialization in the vendor driver (as it won't

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] mac80211/rt2x00: differentiate rf_vals for ht20/ht40

2012-11-12 Thread Сергей Василюгин
Hi I've just checked dir300b1/dir620a1 (rt3050/rt3052) - 40MHz both. 21bit(PLL bypass) of syscfg = 0. So it's board specific. 12.11.2012, 17:29, Gabor Juhos juh...@openwrt.org: 2012.11.12. 10:16 keltezéssel, Daniel Golle írta:  Hi!  Thank you for clarifying this one! That was probably a

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] mac80211/rt2x00: differentiate rf_vals for ht20/ht40

2012-11-11 Thread Daniel Golle
Recent Ralink RFs need different rf_vals depending on whether HT20 or HT40 is being used. Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dgo...@allnet.de create mode 100644 package/mac80211/patches/623-differentiate-rf_vals.patch diff --git a/package/mac80211/patches/622-rt2x00-fix-rt3352-ext-pa.patch

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] mac80211/rt2x00: differentiate rf_vals for ht20/ht40

2012-11-11 Thread Сергей Василюгин
Hi, Daniel And no, No, NO! :) I pooly explain or you don't pay attention. Xtal20/40MHz external clock/tick generator have no direct relation to HT20/HT40 but precision of channel frequency only. So for that case we use corrected frequency rf_vals table. And Xtal20/40MHz really must be read