Seems this discussion has stalled a bit.
I guess it would be reasonable to ask: what could I do to help to get this
moving both here and on LKML ?
I'll go ahead and say that I do not monitor LKML much since I haven't found
a model (that suits me well) for monitoring discussions without getting my
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 February 2015 at 19:24, Florian Fainelli f.faine...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/02/15 07:24, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
Feature implemented and tested on BCM53128.
Slave devices logic copied from the Linux kernel from
On 26 February 2015 at 19:24, Florian Fainelli f.faine...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/02/15 07:24, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
Feature implemented and tested on BCM53128.
Slave devices logic copied from the Linux kernel from Marvell's DSA
driver ( linux/net/dsa/ ).
Also the logic for the Broadcom
Fully agree on converging.
I missed Rafal's switchdev effort.
Before starting on this work, I first tried to look into net/dsa in the
Linux kernel.
I did notice your patches there and started on that.
I got to a decent point, but then I was stuck at some issues.
I later found out that I needed to
I'm also very interested in implementing a switchdev driver (seems to be
a good direction for this type of work), so I'd like to see any efforts
in this direction so far which I can use as a base for my driver. I was
waiting for the switch to Linux 3.19 for the initial code be be easily
On 25/02/15 07:24, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
Feature implemented and tested on BCM53128.
Slave devices logic copied from the Linux kernel from Marvell's DSA
driver ( linux/net/dsa/ ).
Also the logic for the Broadcom tag processing has been copied from there.
There are different efforts here
Feature implemented and tested on BCM53128.
Slave devices logic copied from the Linux kernel from Marvell's DSA
driver ( linux/net/dsa/ ).
Also the logic for the Broadcom tag processing has been copied from there.
OpenWRT's eth_mangle_rx/tx() patch/code is being used to tap into
the packets
