One lantiq device uses ath10kcal_patch_mac, although all ath10k
eeproms have a checksum field and should use
ath10kcal_patch_mac_crc.
This might be because the field is not evaluated by the firmware at
the moment.
Nevertheless, this patch will use ath10kcal_patch_mac_crc for all
devices so the correct checksum is in place.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freif...@adrianschmutzler.de>
---
v2: New patch
---
.../lantiq/base-files/etc/hotplug.d/firmware/11-ath10k-caldata | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
a/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/hotplug.d/firmware/11-ath10k-caldata
b/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/hotplug.d/firmware/11-ath10k-caldata
index 244635c6db..dbfd201193 100644
--- a/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/hotplug.d/firmware/11-ath10k-caldata
+++ b/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/hotplug.d/firmware/11-ath10k-caldata
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ case "$FIRMWARE" in
case $board in
bt,homehub-v5a)
caldata_extract_ubi "caldata" 0x5000 0x844
- ath10kcal_patch_mac $(macaddr_add
$(mtd_get_mac_binary_ubi caldata 0x110c) +3)
+ ath10kcal_patch_mac_crc $(macaddr_add
$(mtd_get_mac_binary_ubi caldata 0x110c) +3)
;;
*)
caldata_die "board $board is not supported yet"
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
