Matthias May wrote:
I'm in the position where i want to use a 9390 as 2x2 instead of 3x3.
I use backports-3.12-1.
I've set the rx and tx mask in eeprom to 0x5.
Every 30 seconds there is a short disconnect.
Enabling some logging in
echo 0x050C /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k/debug
Matthias May wrote:
I'm in the position where i want to use a 9390 as 2x2 instead of 3x3.
I use backports-3.12-1.
I've set the rx and tx mask in eeprom to 0x5.
0x5 is not a valid chainmask on AR9390. The official statement is:
We intentionally didn’t productize the chain mask of 0x5 on
Matthias May wrote:
root@CHD500279:/# echo 0x40d8
/sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy6/ath9k/regidx
root@CHD500279:/# cat /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy6/ath9k/regval
0x0004
On another device showing the same behaviour (but with various other
patches and based on
Alex Hacker wrote:
Thank you Sujith. Probably I understood the following patch in a wrong way.
Felix removed all chain masks checking. If the mask 5 is invalid, how about
the mask 4 and 6?
The patch is correct. For calibration, the mask that is calibrated in
the EEPROM has to be used. Even if
On Friday 08 November 2013 18:33:19 Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hm, is the 0x5 chainmask triggering the ALT_CHAIN logic?
You are talking about ar9003_phy.c - ar9003_hw_set_chain_masks? No, the
device is 3x3 and ah-caps.tx_chainmask ah-caps.rx_chainmask are 7 and not
5. The AR_PHY_ANALOG_SWAP :=
Sven Eckelmann wrote:
You are talking about ar9003_phy.c - ar9003_hw_set_chain_masks? No, the
device is 3x3 and ah-caps.tx_chainmask ah-caps.rx_chainmask are 7 and not
5. The AR_PHY_ANALOG_SWAP := AR_PHY_SWAP_ALT_CHAIN is only done when one of
them would be 5. But I am not really sure what
Hi Sven,
I've asked nbd about this some time ago. It doesn't work if you have gaps in
the chain mask! Try chain mask 3 (110) and it should work with 2x2.
Regards,
-Julius
On 06.11.2013, at 16:04, Sven Eckelmann s...@open-mesh.com wrote:
Hi,
I've needed to test some problems with a
Hm, is the 0x5 chainmask triggering the ALT_CHAIN logic?
What are you trying to do? Control the receive antenna config, or the
transmit antenna config?
-a
On 8 November 2013 16:32, Julius Schulz-Zander
jul...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
Hi Sven,
I've asked nbd about this some time ago.
