There is something strange going on in the buildbot. It doesn't seem to like
the current codebase.
Lots of core packages fail currently e.g. for mips_24kc (=ath79). The core
packages is so intertwined that I can't even figure out which is the actual
culprit.
There is something wrong with the phase2 packages buildbot's faillogs
generation.
It looks like the previous failed logs are not cleaned away after a
successful build. Somehow the success status gets lost?
I think that earlier there used to be a log about the success (until the next
build
Hello,
I've seen that Lantiq XRX200 trunk images are only being built for the VG3503J.
Is this intended, or a mistake?
Thank you.
Cheers,
Vittorio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Hannu A Nyman wrote:
Well, both gb15 and buildslave2 still fail to upload binaries, and as
they are making 9 of the 22 concurrent builds, almost half of the
compiled binaries are discarded. Sad.
Logs from today:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Hannu A Nyman wrote:
Well, both gb15 and buildslave2 still fail to upload binaries, and as they
are making 9 of the 22 concurrent builds, almost half of the compiled
binaries are
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> Hannu A Nyman wrote:
>>
>> Well, both gb15 and buildslave2 still fail to upload binaries, and as they
>> are making 9 of the 22 concurrent builds, almost half of the compiled
>> binaries are discarded. Sad.
>>
>> Logs from
Well, both gb15 and buildslave2 still fail to upload binaries, and as they
are making 9 of the 22 concurrent builds, almost half of the compiled
binaries are discarded. Sad.
Logs from today:
http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86.kvm_guest/builds/119/steps/shell_11/logs/stdio
Hannu Nyman wrote:
Buildbot needs some maintenance, as some of the buildslaves are
behaving badly :-(
1)
gb15 has a wrong host key and silently fails all uploads. It just
completed 4 builds successfully, but did not upload them. That has
been going on for some time now.
It is rather sad that
On 25.10.2015 13:14, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Hannu Nyman wrote:
wyrding timeouts the imagebuilder/SDK tar file creation step for the
largest firmwares. I have noticed that as ar71xx has suffered from that
several times in the last few weeks. The 20 minutes given for waiting for
any output from
Buildbot needs some maintenance, as some of the buildslaves are behaving
badly :-(
1)
gb15 has a wrong host key and silently fails all uploads. It just completed 4
builds successfully, but did not upload them. That has been going on for some
time now.
Build status green, but upload has
Somebody should reboot the buildbot master as it reports all builds as failed
at the broken packages step.
http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/one_line_per_build
The actual builds themselves are ok/failed, but even the ok builds get
declared broken at this step.
There is again the same python
Hi,
Buildbot seems to be running (
http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/),
but there are exceptions shown in the web ui
http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/waterfall
Also broken package doesn't seems up to date
http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/broken_packages/ar71xx/
(the
buildslave4 has destroyed 3/4 of snapshot builds by rapidly failing them and
preventing other buildslaves to try those target plaforms. The slave has been
broken for almost a week. For several platforms the last succesful build has
been 28-Nov, 5 days ago.
(Only those builds succeed that get
On 10/10/2014 07:58, Dirk Neukirchen wrote:
Browsing the buildbots I saw both ramips and ramips.rt3883 [1],[2] fail
with:
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ralink.c:31:26: fatal error: linux/of_i2c.h: No such
file or directory
#include linux/of_i2c.h
linux/of_i2c.h is introduced in:
On 15.3.2014 20:31, Travis Kemen wrote:
Just a quick update, the buildbots should be stable again after this
morning. Finished ironing out the final issues (hopefully) in bringing up a
bunch of virtual boxes. These boxes should be able to complete a full build
in around 9 hours which will
I saw that and added the prerequisite packages to the new boxes as well as
adding it to my deployment script.
Travis
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Hannu Nyman hannu.ny...@iki.fi wrote:
On 15.3.2014 20:31, Travis Kemen wrote:
Just a quick update, the buildbots should be stable again after
Just a quick update, the buildbots should be stable again after this
morning. Finished ironing out the final issues (hopefully) in bringing up a
bunch of virtual boxes. These boxes should be able to complete a full build
in around 9 hours which will reduce our turn around time on updated
Looks like the buildbot is confused...
There are only a few March 12th build attemps and still several buildslaves
sit idle.
Compared to the status a few hours ago, it looks like all not yet started
builds have been removed from the queue and then buildbot simply waits and
says that 22.5
I have been working on getting some new infrastructure brought online and
needed to change the configuration. It appears there is a bug in this
version of buildbot when doing a reconfig. I have restarted it now so we
should be back in business.
Thanks,
Travis
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:10 PM,
Looks like snapshots for the adm5120, ar71xx and adm5120 branches were last
built on 19 Jan 2014...
Aaron Z
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Looks like snapshots for the adm5120, ar71xx and adm5120 branches were
last built on 19 Jan 2014...
ar71xx is being uploaded at this moment, based on r39382...
Builds failed for a few days, but got fixed by 39369(?)
See http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar71xx
The same is probably
I wanted to see if I can get more details about the buildbot setup.
I understand[1] how the defconfig is generated. How is feeds.conf
configured? Is luci part of the build? Is there automated testing that
follows the build? Perhaps posting master.cfg would be helpful.
Thanks,
Ryan
1.
The master has been moved to a new server, waiting for dns to get updated.
Travis
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Hannu Nyman hannu.ny...@iki.fi wrote:
There has not been any new snapshots in three days (since Dec 4th) and
http://buildbot.openwrt.org/ does not answer...
Is the buildbot
There has not been any new snapshots in three days (since Dec 4th) and
http://buildbot.openwrt.org/ does not answer...
Is the buildbot system down for planned maintenance?
Or has it crashed again?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Do we still have need for more buildbot machines? I have a Phenom II 4
core that is set up just for building openwrt. I'm willing to add it
to the build bot if it's still needed. Let me know.
Thanks,
Jonathan Bennett
Incom Systems
___
openwrt-devel
Hi again!
I was wondering if there is anything against having buildbot building images for
RaLink Rt305x devices...?
Anything missing in particular? Help needed?
Cheers
Daniel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Is the buildbot config checked in anywhere?
- Ryan
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
The buildbot config is generated by having the arch and CONFIG_ALL=y in
.config then running make defconfig
Travis
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ryan Nowakowski tuba...@fattuba.com wrote:
Is the buildbot config checked in anywhere?
- Ryan
___
28 matches
Mail list logo