Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] The meaning of Signed-off-by for netifd [Was: Re: [PATCH netifd] interface: warn if ip6hint is truncated]

Hi, > ok, so you claim my SoB means that *I* confirmed that my change is > compatible to the netifd's license. I didn't do that though. as it has been pointed out on this list, adding a S-o-b without consent should not be done, so I reverted the offending commit. Kind regards, Jo signature.as

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] The meaning of Signed-off-by for netifd [Was: Re: [PATCH netifd] interface: warn if ip6hint is truncated]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:56:46PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On 12/3/19 4:28 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:59 PM Uwe Kleine-König > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello Hans, > >> > >> On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe Kleine-Kön

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] The meaning of Signed-off-by for netifd [Was: Re: [PATCH netifd] interface: warn if ip6hint is truncated]

On 12/3/19 4:28 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:59 PM Uwe Kleine-König > wrote: >> >> Hello Hans, >> >> On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe Kleine-König >>> wrote: On 11/29/19 8:50 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > On Wed,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] The meaning of Signed-off-by for netifd [Was: Re: [PATCH netifd] interface: warn if ip6hint is truncated]

On 03/12/19 15:59, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: Hello Hans, On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote: On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe Kleine-König wrote: On 11/29/19 8:50 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote: On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:11 PM Uwe Kleine-König wrote: When for example a /60 is assigned t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] The meaning of Signed-off-by for netifd [Was: Re: [PATCH netifd] interface: warn if ip6hint is truncated]

Hi, On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 16:29, Hans Dedecker wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:59 PM Uwe Kleine-König > wrote: > > > > Hello Hans, > > > > On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe Kleine-König > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On 11/29/19 8:50 PM, Hans D

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] The meaning of Signed-off-by for netifd [Was: Re: [PATCH netifd] interface: warn if ip6hint is truncated]

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:59 PM Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello Hans, > > On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe Kleine-König > > wrote: > >> > >> On 11/29/19 8:50 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > >>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:11 PM Uwe Kleine-König > >>> w

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] The meaning of Signed-off-by for netifd [Was: Re: [PATCH netifd] interface: warn if ip6hint is truncated]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:59:18PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > ok, so you claim my SoB means that *I* confirmed that my change is > compatible to the netifd's license. I didn't do that though. > > Even if it was me who added that line I doubt is has any relevance for > netifd because noth

[OpenWrt-Devel] The meaning of Signed-off-by for netifd [Was: Re: [PATCH netifd] interface: warn if ip6hint is truncated]

Hello Hans, On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe Kleine-König > wrote: >> >> On 11/29/19 8:50 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:11 PM Uwe Kleine-König >>> wrote: When for example a /60 is assigned to a network the last 4