On 17/09/2015 10:54, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 15:23 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>> how i hate this shitty dsl driver ... adding new sockopt is nort an
>> option. that would involve editing the dsl driver and userland and even
>> looking at the code causes permanent brain
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 15:23 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> how i hate this shitty dsl driver ... adding new sockopt is nort an
> option. that would involve editing the dsl driver and userland and even
> looking at the code causes permanent brain damage as can be seen by the
> patches and fixes ... i
On 16/09/15 12:20, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i pushed a patch today that removes some serious ABI brain damage of the
> ATM layer that i introduced 1/2 a decade ago
>
> http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=commit;h=c5d4911448898f7fabdd2c4737ed0820ced4fc4d
>
>
On 17/09/2015 11:11, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 17/09/2015 10:54, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 15:23 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>>> how i hate this shitty dsl driver ... adding new sockopt is nort an
>>> option. that would involve editing the dsl driver and userland and
Hi,
i pushed a patch today that removes some serious ABI brain damage of the
ATM layer that i introduced 1/2 a decade ago
http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=commit;h=c5d4911448898f7fabdd2c4737ed0820ced4fc4d
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/20523
as a side effect you will need to rebuild
On 16/09/2015 13:20, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i pushed a patch today that removes some serious ABI brain damage of the
> ATM layer that i introduced 1/2 a decade ago
>
> http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=commit;h=c5d4911448898f7fabdd2c4737ed0820ced4fc4d
>
>
On 16/09/2015 15:17, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 13:23 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>> thinking about this, the new elements should also be guarded by a #ifdef
>> CONFIG_lantiq will add that now
>
> You can't do that in user-visible headers. CONFIG_LANTIQ isn't defined
> in t
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 13:23 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> thinking about this, the new elements should also be guarded by a #ifdef
> CONFIG_lantiq will add that now
You can't do that in user-visible headers. CONFIG_LANTIQ isn't defined
in t he userspace builds, so userspace will get a version
