Am Sonntag, 7. Juni 2020, 23:39:08 CEST schrieb Rosen Penev:
> > Le 7 juin 2020 à 1:38 PM, Nick a écrit :
> >
> > I would suggest doing this PR as patch like freifunk berlin is doing it:
> > https://github.com/freifunk-berlin/firmware/commit/93f9a026e025c7b663369f5
> > 284cec0bb91345220
>
> Le 7 juin 2020 à 1:38 PM, Nick a écrit :
>
> I would suggest doing this PR as patch like freifunk berlin is doing it:
> https://github.com/freifunk-berlin/firmware/commit/93f9a026e025c7b663369f5284cec0bb91345220
Someone needs to propose one then.
>
> Otherwise, olsrd won't compile anymore.
I would suggest doing this PR as patch like freifunk berlin is doing it:
https://github.com/freifunk-berlin/firmware/commit/93f9a026e025c7b663369f5284cec0bb91345220
Otherwise, olsrd won't compile anymore. :/ Or making a fork, because
olsrd seems not to be maintained anymore.
On 07.06.20 22:27,
Here is a PR that is fixing the issue. Why is that not merged? :/
https://github.com/OLSR/olsrd/pull/79/files
On 07.06.20 22:03, Rosen Penev wrote:
>
>> Le 7 juin 2020 à 1:00 PM, Nick a écrit :
>>
>> I can not compile olsrd daemon with gcc9.
>>> #define isNaN(x) (x != x)
>>> ...
>>> if
> Le 7 juin 2020 à 1:00 PM, Nick a écrit :
>
> I can not compile olsrd daemon with gcc9.
>> #define isNaN(x) (x != x)
>> ...
>> if (!isNaN(gpsdata->fix.time)) {
> Here fix.time is a struct timespec.
> The call is just wrong, or? Why should I check a struct for a valid float?
This broke when
I can not compile olsrd daemon with gcc9.
> #define isNaN(x) (x != x)
> ...
> if (!isNaN(gpsdata->fix.time)) {
Here fix.time is a struct timespec.
The call is just wrong, or? Why should I check a struct for a valid float?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
