On 09/16/2014 04:34 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 15 September 2014 17:33, Matthias Schiffer
mschif...@universe-factory.net wrote:
Ping? I'd like to get this fixed as soon as possible (even though it's
probably too late for the OpenWrt BB final?). I guess I can try to write
a patch,
Ping? I'd like to get this fixed as soon as possible (even though it's
probably too late for the OpenWrt BB final?). I guess I can try to write
a patch, but I had hoped someone on these lists could give some advice
on what the best way to fix this would be...
Matthias
On 09/05/2014 02:15 PM,
Sure, I've attached my testcase (source and compiled for Barrier Breaker).
Matthias
On 09/01/2014 08:31 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Hi,
can you provide a simple testcase showing the bug?
best regards
Waldemar
Am 01.09.2014 um 00:53 schrieb Matthias Schiffer
On 07/25/14 01:16, smile...@gmail.com wrote:
/lib/ld-uClibc.so.0: No such file or directory
Hallo guys,
have any body a idee for the dependency entry?
Where is that message coming from? The build process; running an
application on your target? We are missing a lot of context here; please
/lib/ld-uClibc.so.0: No such file or directory
Hallo guys,
have any body a idee for the dependency entry?
Is there some were a list with the names of the hole ammount of
librarys?
Thanks guy.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org wrote:
Hi Sedat,
Sedat Dilek wrote,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org
wrote:
[...]
I have added most of the patches from your projects on top of uClibc
master.
Did you look also
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org wrote:
Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,
it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version.
The current maintainer does not response on any public or private mails
about a plan to do a needed release. Therefore most of
Hi Sedat,
Sedat Dilek wrote,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org wrote:
Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,
it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version.
The current maintainer does not response on any public or private mails
about a plan to do
Hello,
(adding uclibc and Bernhard)
2014-07-20 12:13 GMT-07:00 Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org:
Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,
it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version.
The current maintainer does not response on any public or private mails
about a plan to do a needed
2014-07-21 11:42 GMT-07:00 Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com:
Dear Florian Fainelli,
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:23:46 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
2014-07-20 12:13 GMT-07:00 Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org:
Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,
it seems there is no plan to
Hi Florian,
Florian Fainelli wrote,
Hello,
(adding uclibc and Bernhard)
2014-07-20 12:13 GMT-07:00 Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org:
Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,
it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version.
The current maintainer does not response on any public
Hi Florian,
Florian Fainelli wrote,
To speak my mind, I think uClibc has no future in the next 2 or 3
years, musl is a much more active project, with multiple embedded
projects starting to use it, on the other end, (e)glibc has remedied
its own problems and its useful again.
I am on your
Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,
it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version.
The current maintainer does not response on any public or private mails
about a plan to do a needed release. Therefore most of you carrying a lot
of patches against uClibc 0.9.33.2 to make it work in your
Ok, just ignore the question. I already noticed that libthread_db is only
available at trunk.
On 8 July 2014 17:50, Carlos Ferreira carlosmf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all!
Can anyone tell me how can I enable the pthread debug mode in uClibc?
I followed the instructions as explained here
Hello all!
Can anyone tell me how can I enable the pthread debug mode in uClibc?
I followed the instructions as explained here
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=25741 with no luck in
obtaining the libthread_db.so.
In here
Le 03/11/13 14:51, Waldemar Brodkorb a écrit :
Hi,
need to unset make to cross-compile with gmake under FreeBSD.
Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb m...@waldemar-brodkorb.de
Applied in r36104, thanks!
--
Florian
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Hi,
need to unset make to cross-compile with gmake under FreeBSD.
Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb m...@waldemar-brodkorb.de
Index: package/libs/uclibc++/patches/001-do-not-set-make.patch
===
---
Hello,
I don't know if this is dependant on my setup or not, but I'm failing
to compile uClibc++.
~$ svn info
Path: .
URL: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk
Repository Root: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt
Repository UUID: 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
Revision: 31481
Node Kind:
Hello,
On Friday 27 April 2012 14:48:57 Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
Hello,
I don't know if this is dependant on my setup or not, but I'm failing
to compile uClibc++.
Please see: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/11341
~$ svn info
Path: .
URL: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk
Repository
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, its a known issue.
See https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/11341 and
http://freetz.org/browser/trunk/make/libs/uclibcxx/patches/050-gcc47x-proper-two-phase-lookup.uclibcxx.patch
~ Jow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Le 27/04/2012 15:01, Jo-Philipp Wich a écrit :
Yes, its a known issue.
See https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/11341 and
http://freetz.org/browser/trunk/make/libs/uclibcxx/patches/050-gcc47x-proper-two-phase-lookup.uclibcxx.patch
~ Jow
Doh!...
I forgot to get a look at the trac. My bad.
Sorry
Hi,
On Sunday 14 March 2010 22:48:10 bud.d...@suisse.org wrote:
which uClibc version are currently used?
if i interpret toolchain/uClibc/Makefile correctly only
0.9.30-git
0.9.30.1
0.9.30.2
0.9.30.3
0.9.30.1 is the default version. 0.9.30.2 was added so that people can test
it, but
which uClibc version are currently used?
if i interpret toolchain/uClibc/Makefile correctly only
0.9.30-git
0.9.30.1
0.9.30.2
0.9.30.3
is this correct or are there still older version used elsewhere?
thanks bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Hi All,
Good afternoon
Please have a look into the following problem and help me to solve this
issue.
1) I am cross compilling iperf-2.0.4 application for ARM linux on
Telo(Router).It is OpenWRT complient.
2) I have written a makefile for iperf package , compiled this makefile
with
Opened a bug for this issue:
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5473
Maddes
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
Yesterday I was trying to build openwrt (svn) and since then it is
giving me an error abount uclibc:
install -d lib/
rm -f lib/ld-uClibc.so lib/ld-uClibc.so.0 lib/ld-uClibc-0.9.29.so
mipsel-openwrt-linux-uclibc-ld -EL -melf32ltsmip -shared --warn-common
--warn-once -z combreloc -z relro -z
Hi Josh,
Le Tuesday 12 May 2009 12:04:52 Josh Abbott, vous avez écrit :
Hi,
Yesterday I was trying to build openwrt (svn) and since then it is
giving me an error abount uclibc:
install -d lib/
rm -f lib/ld-uClibc.so lib/ld-uClibc.so.0 lib/ld-uClibc-0.9.29.so
mipsel-openwrt-linux-uclibc-ld
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Nico n...@openwrt.org wrote:
Hi Josh,
You have to remove the whole toolchain and rebuild it:
make toolchain/clean toolchain/install
(If the below is answered in the docs, excuse the questions. Not
having much luck building the docs.)
OK, this particular
I was only doing make clean and it wasn't working.
I checked out the svn sources once again and now I can build the image again.
Thank you,
josh
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:11, Florian Fainelli flor...@openwrt.org wrote:
Hi Josh,
Le Tuesday 12 May 2009 12:04:52 Josh Abbott, vous avez écrit :
Hello Josh,
make distclean is the solution from Florian, as it will reset your
working copy that it looks like it was checked out from new.
Unfortunately it also deletes the download folder dl, that's why I move
away first then move it back.
Maddes
On Tue, May 12, 2009 16:10, Josh Abbott wrote:
Folks,
2 days ago I built a x86-WRAP package. Build went well (works just fine).
Today, I did an `svn up` (silly me), changed a few packages from M to
*, and performed a rebuild. Build crashes with:
i486-openwrt-linux-uclibc-ld:
/develop/svn/openwrt_wap54g/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_gcc-4.3.3_uClibc-0.9.30/info.mk
/home/mb/develop/svn/openwrt_wap54g/trunk/staging_dir/host/bin/sed -i -e
's,^\(LIBC_VERSION\)=.*,\1=0.9.30,'
The patches are for uClibc 0.9.30.1. Change your .config adding:
CONFIG_UCLIBC_EXTRA_VERSION=.1
ciao
luigi
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Michael Buesch m...@bu3sch.de wrote:
/develop/svn/openwrt_wap54g/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_gcc-4.3.3_uClibc-0.9.30/info.mk
this should be used automatically ... applied at rev 15000
see
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/15000
and uclibc uses the same patches for 0.9.30 and .0.9.30.1
greets
Am Sonntag 29 März 2009 15:01:35 schrieb Luigi Mantellini:
The patches are for uClibc 0.9.30.1. Change your .config adding:
Michael Buesch wrote:
On Sunday 29 March 2009 15:01:35 Luigi Mantellini wrote:
The patches are for uClibc 0.9.30.1. Change your .config adding:
CONFIG_UCLIBC_EXTRA_VERSION=.1
Now libnl fails.
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/mb/develop/svn/openwrt_wap54g/trunk/package/libnl'
Alexandros C. Couloumbis wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alexandros C. Couloumbis alex at ozo.com
Applied in r14231, thanks.
- Felix
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Signed-off-by: Alexandros C. Couloumbis alex at ozo.com
--- uClibc++-0.2.2/include/associative_base.orig2007-06-04
01:51:12.0 +0300
+++ uClibc++-0.2.2/include/associative_base 2008-12-05 05:51:25.0
+0200
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
typedef typename
Hi after some time playing around i created this patches and extended some
from dev.openwrt.org
uclibc-0.9.30.patch: patches taken and updated from ticket #4271 ...
uClibc update patch + mipsel config
vnstat.patch vnstat is creating a false crontab entry: it is using wrong dirs
and its
forgot the ntp patch here it is
greets
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile (Revision 14026)
+++ Makefile (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -9,12 +9,12 @@
include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk
PKG_NAME:=ntp
-PKG_VERSION:=4.2.4p4
Hi Puchu,
I have looked a little though your patches, not completely and I did no
testing. Especially for uClibc there has to be done more.
I found this lines, in my opinion there are wrong:
selectable uClibc Version (uClibc 0.9.28) is broken in trunk, because the
file/dir layout seems to have changed since 7.09. The first problem [0]
can be fixed by something like the simple patch in [1].
Don't do that. The error suggests that you have a problem i kernel headers.
What
-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens
Nachtigall
Sent: Tuesday, 8 July 2008 11:07 PM
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uclibc 0.9.28 broken in trunk
selectable uClibc Version (uClibc
Hi,
selectable uClibc Version (uClibc 0.9.28) is broken in trunk, because the
file/dir layout seems to have changed since 7.09. The first problem [0] can
be fixed by something like the simple patch in [1]. However soon after one
meets the next problem with extra/scripts/gen_bits_syscall_h.sh
43 matches
Mail list logo
