On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 3:20 PM Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:34:48PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 1:53 PM Christian Marangi
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 06:04:22PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > > We're assuming all root=
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:34:48PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 1:53 PM Christian Marangi wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 06:04:22PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > We're assuming all root= arguments are /dev/ paths, but many targets
> > > utilize root=PARTUUID=
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 1:53 PM Christian Marangi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 06:04:22PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > We're assuming all root= arguments are /dev/ paths, but many targets
> > utilize root=PARTUUID= strategies. At least allow them to fall back
> > to scanning all block
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 06:04:22PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> We're assuming all root= arguments are /dev/ paths, but many targets
> utilize root=PARTUUID= strategies. At least allow them to fall back
> to scanning all block devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris
Can you elaborate this a
We're assuming all root= arguments are /dev/ paths, but many targets
utilize root=PARTUUID= strategies. At least allow them to fall back
to scanning all block devices.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris
---
Changes in v2:
* fstools, not fsutils (sorry for the noise)
libfstools/partname.c | 4 ++--
