Perry [2021-09-17 14:07:14]:
Hi,
> Would it be possible to have all the headers in the themes to contain a
> link to https (iff the correct packages are installed)? A bonus would
> be a nice mouse-over explaining to the user about the "potential secure
> risk ahead" with regards to the
Hi Fernando,
Sorry for any confusion. Our suggestion has two parts. 1) a link in the
header which allows the user to go from http to https. 2) a mouse-over
message explaining self-signed certificates.
Part 2 is a bonus. But I think it would be really nice. An
inexperienced user might worry
Hello Perry
I didn't understand your suggestion fully.
You wish to put some warning to users who are willing to use https about
the self-signed certificate ou about users using http ?
Regards
Fernando
On 17/09/2021 09:07, Perry wrote:
Hi all,
This issue has come up recently in the
Hi all,
This issue has come up recently in the Freifunk-Berlin community. We
have brainstormed a little bit and came up with a suggestion.
Would it be possible to have all the headers in the themes to contain a
link to https (iff the correct packages are installed)? A bonus would
be a nice
Seems good to me.
The main question is: most home users will require it ? I don't think
so. But there may be others that may do, so as long http does not
forward to https seems a good approach so those who want can
deliberately use https.
I think as it stands now forcing https only would be a
Hi Hauke,
Le dim. 16 mai 2021 à 09:21, Hauke Mehrtens a écrit :
>
> On 5/14/21 4:22 PM, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Le ven. 14 mai 2021 à 05:00, Petr Štetiar a écrit :
> >>
> >> Fernando Frediani [2021-05-11 20:13:18]:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> I am no sure https support
On 5/14/21 4:22 PM, Etienne Champetier wrote:
Hi All,
Le ven. 14 mai 2021 à 05:00, Petr Štetiar a écrit :
Fernando Frediani [2021-05-11 20:13:18]:
Hi,
I am no sure https support should still be something by default in the
images as it's not something really essential
to me it's like
On 5/16/21 2:30 AM, Fernando Frediani wrote:
On 15/05/2021 18:57, Alberto Bursi wrote:
If HTTPS is still an optional it makes no sense to treat it
differently from all other optional packages.
The only moment it should be included by default is when it becomes
mandatory, and the HTTP
On 15/05/2021 18:57, Alberto Bursi wrote:
If HTTPS is still an optional it makes no sense to treat it
differently from all other optional packages.
The only moment it should be included by default is when it becomes
mandatory, and the HTTP interface is disabled.
Maybe you are right here.
> On 15/05/21 22:13, Fernando Frediani wrote:
On 15/05/2021 16:59, Alberto Bursi wrote:
I'm personally in the "encrypt all the things" camp. I fully support a
switch to https only.
But it should be a default, not a "let's add stuff people might want
to enable later". Either all in or
On 15/05/2021 16:59, Alberto Bursi wrote:
I'm personally in the "encrypt all the things" camp. I fully support a
switch to https only.
But it should be a default, not a "let's add stuff people might want
to enable later". Either all in or all out.
Perhaps that's the problem.
There has
On 14/05/21 10:58, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Fernando Frediani [2021-05-11 20:13:18]:
Hi,
I am no sure https support should still be something by default in the
images as it's not something really essential
to me it's like discussion about telnet versus SSH. (Puting aside, that one
shouldn't
Yeah I understand even if HTTPS wouldn't come enabled by default (and it
shouldn't), but only available with that and that may seem Ok. My only
concern has been how much these extras consume on the default image for
not being something essential.
I understand there has been a movement to have
Hi All,
Le ven. 14 mai 2021 à 05:00, Petr Štetiar a écrit :
>
> Fernando Frediani [2021-05-11 20:13:18]:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I am no sure https support should still be something by default in the
> > images as it's not something really essential
>
> to me it's like discussion about telnet versus SSH.
Fernando Frediani [2021-05-11 20:13:18]:
Hi,
> I am no sure https support should still be something by default in the
> images as it's not something really essential
to me it's like discussion about telnet versus SSH. (Puting aside, that one
shouldn't be using password at all) If it's fine
I am no sure https support should still be something by default in the
images as it's not something really essential although the storage usage
increase seems really low based on what you mention.
Fernando
On 11/05/2021 19:55, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi,
OpenWrt 21.02 currently ships with
Hi,
OpenWrt 21.02 currently ships with wolfssl and LuCI for http.
It would be nice to also have https support included in the default images.
To add this the following packages have to be added:
* luci-ssl (969 Bytes ipkg)
* px5g-wolfssl (5216 bytes ipkg)
For me the images increased by 2.2
17 matches
Mail list logo
