John Crispin writes:
> that ubnt 6-lr unit boots fine with HEAD and delivers good
> performance. It is really hard to get hold of them right now in EU. I
> managed to get one as "used" on ebay and after initial testing sent it
> off to Daniel s.T. he can give it some loving care in regards to
>
the
On 26.05.21 18:44, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Alberto Bursi writes:
On 26/05/21 10:56, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Daniel Golle writes:
When using as dual-band AP, also the Gigabit Ethernet of the E8450 can
become a bottle-kneck, UniFi 6 LR got that Aquantina 2.5GBase-T PHY
But there is no driver for
Alberto Bursi writes:
> On 26/05/21 10:56, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> Daniel Golle writes:
>>
>>> When using as dual-band AP, also the Gigabit Ethernet of the E8450 can
>>> become a bottle-kneck, UniFi 6 LR got that Aquantina 2.5GBase-T PHY
>> But there is no driver for that yet, right? And for
On 26/05/21 10:56, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Daniel Golle writes:
When using as dual-band AP, also the Gigabit Ethernet of the E8450 can
become a bottle-kneck, UniFi 6 LR got that Aquantina 2.5GBase-T PHY
But there is no driver for that yet, right? And for those of us who
aren't familiar with
Daniel Golle writes:
> When using as dual-band AP, also the Gigabit Ethernet of the E8450 can
> become a bottle-kneck, UniFi 6 LR got that Aquantina 2.5GBase-T PHY
But there is no driver for that yet, right? And for those of us who
aren't familiar with these magic phy things: Does this mean
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 5/18/21 11:52 PM, Philip
On 21.05.21 20:18, Stijn Segers wrote:
Oh you'd provably get the board up and running in a jiffy. I suppose the
multi-gigabit PHYs might already be supported as well - not in the loop in
those. The wireless? Just look at Broadcom's FOSS track record with
802.11g/n/ac. And vote with your
Hi,
Mike Bernardo schreef op 21 mei 2021 13:46:25 CEST:
>Would be great if we could get openwrt running on these, with 2.5gigE and AX.
>
>https://www.fs.com/products/115390.html
>
>It is a BCM47622, I wonder how difficult this would be?
Oh you'd provably get the board up and running in a jiffy.
Would be great if we could get openwrt running on these, with 2.5gigE and AX.
https://www.fs.com/products/115390.html
It is a BCM47622, I wonder how difficult this would be? I'd be tempted to buy
one to give it a try.
Mike
> On 2021/05/21, at 04:58:46 CDT (-05:00), Daniel Golle
> wrote:
>
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:26:58PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
> > On May 18, 2021, at 10:57 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> >
> > On 19.05.21 00:09, Paul Spooren wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 5/18/21 11:52 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I noticed that there are
> On May 18, 2021, at 10:57 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>
> On 19.05.21 00:09, Paul Spooren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 5/18/21 11:52 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I noticed that there are several AX routers from TP-Link, Netgear, D-Link,
>>> etc. and some of them have even had
On 19.05.21 00:09, Paul Spooren wrote:
Hi,
On 5/18/21 11:52 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that there are several AX routers from TP-Link, Netgear,
D-Link, etc. and some of them have even had OpenWRT ported to them.
Which of these various platforms has the most
Hi,
On 5/18/21 11:52 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that there are several AX routers from TP-Link, Netgear, D-Link, etc.
and some of them have even had OpenWRT ported to them.
Which of these various platforms has the most CPU/RAM/FLASH? A few are discussed, but I'm
not
Hi all,
I noticed that there are several AX routers from TP-Link, Netgear, D-Link, etc.
and some of them have even had OpenWRT ported to them.
Which of these various platforms has the most CPU/RAM/FLASH? A few are
discussed, but I'm not seeing consensus on "the best one currently is this..."
14 matches
Mail list logo
