Re: 20.xx: state of the DSA

2021-02-02 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi On 2021-02-02, Paul Spooren wrote: > Hi all, > > could you please update me on this matter? What's missing and what > blocking for a release? > > The LuCI PR is still open: https://github.com/openwrt/luci/pull/4307 My initial testing of that PR on a ZyXEL GS1900-8 (RTL8382M) has been pretty

RE: 20.xx: state of the DSA

2021-02-02 Thread Paul Spooren
Hi all, could you please update me on this matter? What's missing and what blocking for a release? The LuCI PR is still open: https://github.com/openwrt/luci/pull/4307 Where there changes to other targets? Can we just do a hybrid release at this point? Best, Paul On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at

Re: 20.xx: state of the DSA

2020-11-20 Thread Torbjorn Jansson
On 2020-11-20 09:29, Georgi Valkov wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 8:37 PM Rosen Penev wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:40 PM Paul Spooren wrote: Hi all, DSA (Distributed Switch Architecture)[0] is a main feature of 20.xx and one of the last blockers for a branch. The goal states[1]

RE: 20.xx: state of the DSA

2020-11-20 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Paul Spooren > Sent: Freitag, 20. November 2020 01:36 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: 20.xx: state of the DSA > > Hi all, > > DSA (Distributed Switch

Re: 20.xx: state of the DSA

2020-11-20 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 20/11/20 01:36, Paul Spooren wrote: Hi all, DSA (Distributed Switch Architecture)[0] is a main feature of 20.xx and one of the last blockers for a branch. The goal states[1] support where possible, not necessarily every target. This mail thread should be used to get an overview of the

Re: 20.xx: state of the DSA

2020-11-20 Thread Birger Koblitz
Hi, It is not necessary to enable swconfig for this target. I initially enabled it because luci was checking for the swconfig binary in order to show switch information at all. This is no longer necessary. Birger On 20.11.20 06:12, Rosen Penev wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 8:37 PM Rosen

Re: 20.xx: state of the DSA

2020-11-20 Thread Georgi Valkov
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 8:37 PM Rosen Penev wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:40 PM Paul Spooren wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> DSA (Distributed Switch Architecture)[0] is a main feature of 20.xx and >>> one of the last blockers for a branch. The goal states[1] support where >>>

Re: 20.xx: state of the DSA

2020-11-19 Thread Rosen Penev
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 8:37 PM Rosen Penev wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:40 PM Paul Spooren wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > DSA (Distributed Switch Architecture)[0] is a main feature of 20.xx and > > one of the last blockers for a branch. The goal states[1] support where > > possible, not

Re: 20.xx: state of the DSA

2020-11-19 Thread Rosen Penev
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:40 PM Paul Spooren wrote: > > Hi all, > > DSA (Distributed Switch Architecture)[0] is a main feature of 20.xx and > one of the last blockers for a branch. The goal states[1] support where > possible, not necessarily every target. > > This mail thread should be used to

Re: 20.xx: state of the DSA

2020-11-19 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi On 2020-11-19, Paul Spooren wrote: [...] > The following targets seem use `swconfig`, should/can they be ported? > Please post states and links to work in progress migrations: [...] > * ath79 [...] > * ipq40xx > * ipq806x [...] > * lantiq/xrx200 [...] [ ipq807x is questionable at the moment,