RE: Restoring (old) config backups and

2020-08-03 Thread mail
; >> On Behalf Of Alberto Bursi > >> Sent: Dienstag, 21. Juli 2020 09:48 > >> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; m...@adrianschmutzler.de > >> Subject: Re: Restoring (old) config backups and > >> > >> > >> On 20/07/20 19:32, Henrique d

Re: Restoring (old) config backups and

2020-08-01 Thread Rich Brown
>> On Aug 1, 2020, at 10:05 AM, Paul Oranje wrote: >> >>> Actually, my solution implements the config "on device" as a uci parameter, >>> so the "on device" version is actually not the version of the firmware >>> installed, but of the config installed. Therefore, one may indeed go that >>>

Re: Restoring (old) config backups and

2020-08-01 Thread Paul Oranje
i 2020 09:48 >> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; m...@adrianschmutzler.de >> Subject: Re: Restoring (old) config backups and >> >> >> On 20/07/20 19:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >>> >>> >>> Any thoughts on this? I am certainly to have

RE: Restoring (old) config backups and

2020-07-21 Thread mail
> -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Alberto Bursi > Sent: Dienstag, 21. Juli 2020 09:48 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; m...@adrianschmutzler.de > Subject: Re: Restoring (old) config backups an

Re: Restoring (old) config backups and

2020-07-21 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 20/07/20 19:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: Any thoughts on this?  I am certainly to have overlooked a lot of stuff, especially if it is present only on master.  Also, handling of an uci-defaults "reset" (so that they'd run again) in non-initramfs/overlayfs based system is likely

Re: Restoring (old) config backups and

2020-07-20 Thread Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
Hello, > The problems we've observed with the backup *restore* functionality are: > > * It is applied with a simple reboot, and _apparently_, it has no hooks > or other way to ensure system sanity before (or after) the backup restore. > > Which would be fine if the following point was never true: