Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

Hi, It doesn't look like there are any takers for this task. Can anyone guide me to a 101 tutorial on making a brand new package? dnscrypt-proxy 2 is completely different from its predecessor. There are sources, as well as pre-build binaries for 20+ architectures. go is required to build. I'd

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > Hi, > > It doesn't look like there are any takers for this task. > Can anyone guide me to a 101 tutorial on making a brand new package? I guess you can start with a wiki page for this:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

On my MIPS32 (WNDR3800) system, I noticed the C binary was <100k. The GO binary is 6.5MB, I ran upx on it and it went down to 1.5M. It incurs about 1s of delay for unpacking, but it works. I don't know much about packaging this around the uci scripting, etc, but I hope this helps the maintainer a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

The OpenWrt Makefile aims to get dnscrypt-proxy 1.9.5 from a mirror at https://github.com/dyne/dnscrypt-proxy However, the upstream (Frank Denis) recently released a 2.0 which is significantly different. It's now written in go, instead of C and it support the new version of the protocol (v2). If

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

Hello, Last time I reported this issue was for MT7620. dnscrypt-proxy now failing for MT7621. http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/broken_packages/ramips.mt7621/dnscrypt-proxy/compile.txt I am not sure what was the fix made. Likely was related to SSL cert check. Can anyone please look at this and

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:03:07 +0530 Mangesh Bhamre wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Looking at build log - > http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/broken_packages/ramips.mt7620/dnscrypt-proxy/compile.txt > > Tar ball is available on download.dnscrypt.org . Build download fails > for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

Hi Alex, Looking at build log - http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/broken_packages/ramips.mt7620/dnscrypt-proxy/compile.txt Tar ball is available on download.dnscrypt.org . Build download fails for some SSL issue. Also, tar ball is missing on mirror2.openwrt.org and downloads.openwrt.org/sources

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

If I got this correctly it's broken for that target as well http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/broken_packages/ramips.mt7620/ It looks like an issue with the source tar ball not being present in any OpenWrt mirror. Well, that was the error when it tried to build. Looks like dnscrypt-proxy was

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

Hi Alex, ramips architecture. Mt7620 make file. Regards Mangesh On 11-Feb-2017 4:56 PM, "Alexandru Ardelean" wrote: > Hey Mangesh, > > So, I don't use much ImageBuilder. > I don't even know how that works. > > I usually just do > > < get OpenWrt repo > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

Hi Alex and OpenWRT Team, Any help on getting dnscrypt-proxy package into snapshot will be helpful. It is working fine with 15.05.1 - but not snapshot ImageBuilder. Regards, Mangesh Bhamre On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Mangesh Bhamre wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Snapshot

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

Hi Alex, Snapshot don't have any reference of 'dnscrypt-proxy'. It is supported in CC 15.05.1 and I am able to add 'dnscrypt-proxy' in list of packages to include while building with CC Image-builder. I scanned through all snapshot image-builder and no reference there. I run following command to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

Do you have a Package/dnscrypt-proxy/install rule ? Are you calling the BuildPackage rule ? Do you have Package/dnscrypt-proxy/description rule ? And check for typos if above stuff is checked. Thanks Alex On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 at 18:21, Mangesh Bhamre wrote: > Hello