Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-27 Thread Russell Senior
devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > > On Behalf Of Vincent Wiemann > > Sent: Sonntag, 23. Mai 2021 14:20 > > To: Russell Senior ; openwrt- > > de...@lists.openwrt.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW) >

RE: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-27 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Vincent Wiemann > Sent: Sonntag, 23. Mai 2021 14:20 > To: Russell Senior ; openwrt- > de...@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support f

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-25 Thread Petr Štetiar
Russell Senior [2021-05-25 04:06:30]: Hi, > Looking closer, I realize that the mtd-mac-address line isn't even > needed, since it will inherit it from the included > ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi. > > I took a swing at replacing mtd-mac-address with nvmem-cells as in > your example, but I got an

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-25 Thread Russell Senior
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 2:33 AM Russell Senior wrote: > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 1:40 AM Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > > On 23.05.2021 13:59, Russell Senior wrote: > > > + { > > > + status = "okay"; > > > + > > > + /* default for ar934x, except for 1000M and 10M */ > > > + pll-data =

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-25 Thread Russell Senior
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 3:57 AM Russell Senior wrote: > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 3:33 AM Vincent Wiemann > wrote: > > > > On 5/25/21 2:23 AM, Russell Senior wrote: > > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 2:51 AM Vincent Wiemann > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Russel, > > >> > > >> On 5/24/21 1:06 AM,

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-25 Thread Russell Senior
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 3:33 AM Vincent Wiemann wrote: > > On 5/25/21 2:23 AM, Russell Senior wrote: > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 2:51 AM Vincent Wiemann > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Russel, > >> > >> On 5/24/21 1:06 AM, Russell Senior wrote: > >>> On the PowerBeam M2 (PBE-M2-400) I see "e2 c2" in the

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-25 Thread Vincent Wiemann
On 5/25/21 2:23 AM, Russell Senior wrote: On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 2:51 AM Vincent Wiemann wrote: Hi Russel, On 5/24/21 1:06 AM, Russell Senior wrote: On the PowerBeam M2 (PBE-M2-400) I see "e2 c2" in the same locations, not "e6 c2". That's very interesting... I think the PowerBeam 400

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-25 Thread Russell Senior
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 1:40 AM Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > On 23.05.2021 13:59, Russell Senior wrote: > > + { > > + status = "okay"; > > + > > + /* default for ar934x, except for 1000M and 10M */ > > + pll-data = <0x0200 0x0101 0x1313>; > > + > > + mtd-mac-address = <

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-25 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 23.05.2021 13:59, Russell Senior wrote: + { + status = "okay"; + + /* default for ar934x, except for 1000M and 10M */ + pll-data = <0x0200 0x0101 0x1313>; + + mtd-mac-address = < 0x0>; I'd love to have new DTS use upstream "nvmem-cells" property for that

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-24 Thread Russell Senior
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 2:51 AM Vincent Wiemann wrote: > > Hi Russel, > > On 5/24/21 1:06 AM, Russell Senior wrote: > > On the PowerBeam M2 (PBE-M2-400) I see "e2 c2" in the same locations, not > > "e6 c2". > > That's very interesting... I think the PowerBeam 400 was sold under the > NanoBeam

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-24 Thread Joe Ayers
> Subject: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW) > Message-ID: <20210523115946.711907-1-russ...@personaltelco.net> > > This patch adds support for the Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW), e.g. PBE-M5-400, > a 802.11n wireless with a feed+dish form factor. This device was previously >

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-24 Thread Vincent Wiemann
Hi Russel, On 5/24/21 1:06 AM, Russell Senior wrote: On the PowerBeam M2 (PBE-M2-400) I see "e2 c2" in the same locations, not "e6 c2". That's very interesting... I think the PowerBeam 400 was sold under the NanoBeam series at the beginning. So there might be an entry missing. Is your

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-24 Thread Russell Senior
> "Vincent" == Vincent Wiemann writes: Vincent> Just as a side-note: There are 5 different versions of the Vincent> PowerBeam with different device IDs... Vincent> Source: Vincent> https://github.com/freifunk-gluon/gluon/issues/94#issuecomment-510831878 Vincent> -- PowerBeam M5 -- ERP 26

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-23 Thread Vincent Wiemann
Just as a side-note: There are 5 different versions of the PowerBeam with different device IDs... Source: https://github.com/freifunk-gluon/gluon/issues/94#issuecomment-510831878 -- PowerBeam M5 -- ERP 26 dBm according to datasheet 'e3e5' = { --