On 6.02.2023 12:28, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 3.02.2023 21:26, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Have you managed to get a `perf record` or `perf top` capture to see whether we
might be going a little too far into iptables-raw code rather than bailing out
early if we are not utilizing it?
Just did.
It
On 3.02.2023 21:26, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Have you managed to get a `perf record` or `perf top` capture to see whether we
might be going a little too far into iptables-raw code rather than bailing out
early if we are not utilizing it?
Just did.
It doesn't hele me much but maybe you can
On 2/3/23 08:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Another step in my NAT performance debugging.
I realized that my OpenWrt 21.02 based bcm53xx builds can't reach 940
Mb/s because I have qos-scripts installed.
It happens even with QoS interface disabled:
qos.wan.enabled='0'
and with QoS disabled in
I dont use qos-scripts, but sqm-scripts. That said, cake peers into
the nat table to balance the traffic better.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 8:23 AM Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>
> Another step in my NAT performance debugging.
>
> I realized that my OpenWrt 21.02 based bcm53xx builds can't reach 940
> Mb/s
Another step in my NAT performance debugging.
I realized that my OpenWrt 21.02 based bcm53xx builds can't reach 940
Mb/s because I have qos-scripts installed.
It happens even with QoS interface disabled:
qos.wan.enabled='0'
and with QoS disabled in general:
/etc/init.d/qos stop
(disable & reboot
