Re: ath79: sysupgrade format policy for ar71xx migrations

2021-01-02 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Saturday, 2 January 2021 15:22:38 CET David Bauer wrote: > sorry for the late reply. > > Firs to fall, there is no real policy on that one, as OpenWrt itself does not > advertise support for cross-target upgrades. It might work, or it might not. Thanks for the reply. But the option 3 was

Re: ath79: sysupgrade format policy for ar71xx migrations

2021-01-02 Thread David Bauer
Hi Sven, sorry for the late reply. Firs to fall, there is no real policy on that one, as OpenWrt itself does not advertise support for cross-target upgrades. It might work, or it might not. On 11/25/20 8:53 AM, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Tuesday, 24 November 2020 08:58:04 CET Sven Eckelmann

Re: ath79: sysupgrade format policy for ar71xx migrations

2020-11-24 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Tuesday, 24 November 2020 08:58:04 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote: [...] > Now to the actual question: I will just add some extra info to the options shown below. Maybe it makes then more sense why I've added two gluon developers to the Cc. > What should the OpenMesh devices use as images for

ath79: sysupgrade format policy for ar71xx migrations

2020-11-24 Thread Sven Eckelmann
Hi, I am currently a little bit unsure about the preferred sysupgrade format when an ar71xx device is re-added as ath79 device. I know that there is a migration guide for users [1] but I didn't see one for developers. First a little bit of background: The OpenMesh devices used the combined