On 1/22/23 13:58, Daniel Santos wrote:
[snip]
Thanks Daniel and all the others (to many to mention). Yes, I should have read
the datasheet much earlier, so in the end I really have only myself to blame.
The fix was simply to add back in the "rgmii2" group back into the gpio group.
I
On 1/22/23 12:24, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
On 22.01.2023 20:44, Daniel Santos wrote:
On 1/22/23 00:23, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
On 22 January 2023 02:02:04 GMT+03:00, Daniel Santos
wrote:
On 1/21/23 15:19, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
On 21.01.2023 21:32, Daniel Santos wrote:
... You can use this to see what the
On 22.01.2023 20:44, Daniel Santos wrote:
On 1/22/23 00:23, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
On 22 January 2023 02:02:04 GMT+03:00, Daniel Santos
wrote:
On 1/21/23 15:19, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
On 21.01.2023 21:32, Daniel Santos wrote:
... You can use this to see what the valid values are for each
group,
Hi Bas,
> On 21 Jan 2023, at 22:53, Bas Mevissen wrote:
>
>> On 2023-01-21 22:42, Lukas Zeller wrote:
>> That really looks like a great solution with all advantages combined!
>> I agree this is better than patching, I just did not realize it was
>> possible at all to modularize dt overlay
On 21.01.23 15:51, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
AFAICS, the Ralink driver sets gpio mode for a group of pins using
set_mux operation [1] so when the
gpio_request_enable() operation is called a check for that pin is set
as gpio is performed. Nothing else.
Maybe John Crispin who is the writer of
On 22 January 2023 02:02:04 GMT+03:00, Daniel Santos
wrote:
>On 1/21/23 15:19, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>> On 21.01.2023 21:32, Daniel Santos wrote:
>>> ... You can use this to see what the valid values are for each group,
>>> because until this all goes yaml, there's nothing to tell you if you've
On 1/21/23 15:19, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
On 21.01.2023 21:32, Daniel Santos wrote:
... You can use this to see what the valid values are for each group,
because until this all goes yaml, there's nothing to tell you if
you've used an invalid value.
Speaking of which:
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2023-01-21 22:42, Lukas
Hi Tomasz,
thanks a lot for that hint to dtbocfg and the makefile!
> On 21 Jan 2023, at 17:27, Tomasz Maciej Nowak wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> W dniu 21.01.2023 o 16:33, Lukas Zeller pisze:
>>
>> So basically, I'm suggesting to revisit the decision to reject the patch
>> from Daniel Golle [1].
>
By the way, I just got an "undelivered mail returned to sender" for
John's mail address. I don't think they'll be replying here any time
soon. ;)
Arınç
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
On 21.01.2023 21:32, Daniel Santos wrote:
Hello all,
I saw this a few days ago, but was too busy to answer then -- sorry
about that. I've dug into this code a bit, but for the mt7620.
On 1/21/23 08:51, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
Hi,
[+cc John Crispin]
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 2:45 PM Arınç
Hello all,
I saw this a few days ago, but was too busy to answer then -- sorry
about that. I've dug into this code a bit, but for the mt7620.
On 1/21/23 08:51, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
Hi,
[+cc John Crispin]
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 2:45 PM Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
On 21.01.2023 10:56, Sergio
Hi.
W dniu 21.01.2023 o 16:33, Lukas Zeller pisze:
> Hi Sergio, thanks for the reply!
>
> On 21 Jan 2023, at 14:00, Sergio Paracuellos
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 1:19 PM Lukas Zeller wrote:
>>> [...]So while I understand that using only the DT mechanisms for
>>> configuring GPIO
Hi Sergio, thanks for the reply!
On 21 Jan 2023, at 14:00, Sergio Paracuellos
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 1:19 PM Lukas Zeller wrote:
>> [...]So while I understand that using only the DT mechanisms for configuring
>> GPIO modes, named gpios and libgpiod instead of /sys/class/gpio etc.
Hi,
[+cc John Crispin]
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 2:45 PM Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>
> On 21.01.2023 10:56, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 7:03 AM Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> >>
> >> Pins from 22 to 33 are on the rgmii2 pin group. They don't function as
> >> GPIO by default.
On 21.01.2023 10:56, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 7:03 AM Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
Pins from 22 to 33 are on the rgmii2 pin group. They don't function as
GPIO by default. Requesting a gpio by either from devicetree or `echo
203 > /sys/class/gpio/export` won't change
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 1:19 PM Lukas Zeller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On 21 Jan 2023, at 08:56, Sergio Paracuellos
> > wrote:
> >
> > [...] Yes, you have to claim the pin group as gpio on the device tree to
> > make this work.
>
> This revals a underlying problem I tried to ask about back in
Hi,
> On 21 Jan 2023, at 08:56, Sergio Paracuellos
> wrote:
>
> [...] Yes, you have to claim the pin group as gpio on the device tree to
> make this work.
This revals a underlying problem I tried to ask about back in June 2022 [1] -
what is the state of userland GPIO support in OpenWrt?
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 7:03 AM Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>
> Pins from 22 to 33 are on the rgmii2 pin group. They don't function as
> GPIO by default. Requesting a gpio by either from devicetree or `echo
> 203 > /sys/class/gpio/export` won't change anything. You have to claim
> the pin group as
Pins from 22 to 33 are on the rgmii2 pin group. They don't function as
GPIO by default. Requesting a gpio by either from devicetree or `echo
203 > /sys/class/gpio/export` won't change anything. You have to claim
the pin group as gpio on the devicetree.
Quoting my response from [0]:
CC: Sergio
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:29 AM Peter Naulls wrote:
>
>
>
> I posted previously on GPIOs, which caused some debate; this may or may not
> be relevant, but I'd be remiss to not mention it:
>
> http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2022-October/039593.html
>
> I've been
I posted previously on GPIOs, which caused some debate; this may or may not
be relevant, but I'd be remiss to not mention it:
http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2022-October/039593.html
I've been chasing an issue with GPIO mapping in for an mt7621 on the OpenWrt
5.10.161 etc
22 matches
Mail list logo
