Hello Mathias,
2 workarounds were suggested:
One was not acceptable as is defeated the purpose of a router asking to
configure static routes on EVERY host in a LAN
The second might work with some careful re-configuration of the
firewall. It did not in my case because the complexity of the
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Baptiste Jonglez
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:24:04AM +, Tim Coote wrote:
>>
>> > On 12 Jan 2017, at 21:24, Hans Dedecker wrote:
>> >
>> >> config interface 'e0ext'
>> >>option ifname
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:24:04AM +, Tim Coote wrote:
>
> > On 12 Jan 2017, at 21:24, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> >
> >> config interface 'e0ext'
> >>option ifname 'pppoe-e0'
> > You need to configure the ifname as an aliased interface of interface e0;
> > eg
> >
All,
I built LEDE r2960, the patch is included and routing works fine now.
This was an excellent fast fix from Jo-Philipp.
Thank you Jo!
On 13/01/17 18:47, Lucian Cristian wrote:
On 13.01.2017 20:16, Mauro M. wrote:
Hello Mathias,
2 workarounds were suggested:
One was not acceptable as
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:11 AM, L. D. Pinney wrote:
> Go back to playing the guitar and smoking dopethat's what you do best.
I look forward very much to doing more of that... after lede ships.
In the interim, I have two fairly large testbeds setup to test lede -
the ATF
On 13.01.2017 20:16, Mauro M. wrote:
Hello Mathias,
2 workarounds were suggested:
One was not acceptable as is defeated the purpose of a router asking
to configure static routes on EVERY host in a LAN
The second might work with some careful re-configuration of the
firewall. It did not in
Hello,
Is OpenWRT going to backport support for BtHomeHub5 from LEDE?
This router is very well supported in LEDE, whilst support is only basic
in OpenWrt,
LEDE implemented some broken changes in the firewall that prevent basic
routing (it defeats the primary purpose of a router!), so I would
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Mauro M. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is OpenWRT going to backport support for BtHomeHub5 from LEDE?
> This router is very well supported in LEDE, whilst support is only basic in
> OpenWrt,
> LEDE implemented some broken changes in the firewall that
2017-01-13 18:35 GMT+01:00 Martin Blumenstingl
:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Mauro M. wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is OpenWRT going to backport support for BtHomeHub5 from LEDE?
>> This router is very well supported in LEDE, whilst
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Mauro M. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is OpenWRT going to backport support for BtHomeHub5 from LEDE?
> This router is very well supported in LEDE, whilst support is only basic in
> OpenWrt,
> LEDE implemented some broken changes in the firewall that
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The amount of patches on top of rt2x00 has grown into a huge pile
> during the past couple of years. To get things into a shape that allow
> discussing and merging them upstream, I created a tree on github based
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 05:17:23PM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:59:59PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> > > The advantage of pull requests is that author information can be
> > > preserved more easily. Running git format-patch results in most
> > > patches
> > >
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:59:59PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> > The advantage of pull requests is that author information can be
> > preserved more easily. Running git format-patch results in most
> > patches
> > having wrong SMTP sender information due to the assumption that the
> > patch
Hi Martin,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 01:28:06AM +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > The amount of patches on top of rt2x00 has grown into a huge pile
> > during the past couple of years. To get things into
> On 12 Jan 2017, at 21:24, Hans Dedecker wrote:
>
>> config interface 'e0ext'
>> option ifname 'pppoe-e0'
> You need to configure the ifname as an aliased interface of interface e0; eg
> option ifname @e0
>
Thanks, Hans. Should I have been able to spot that
Hi Anatoliy, Xue,
>> ci40 has already some work on it. You could have a look.
Currently we have the lowpan configuration for Creator Ci40 at
https://github.com/CreatorDev/openwrt/blob/ci40/target/linux/pistachio/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/config/network.
And lowpan proto setup is done by
Hi Kalle,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:46:56PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Daniel Golle writes:
> > ...
> > Please review and comment, so we can get those patches merged!
>
> No pull requests, please. Instead send these as patches, easier to
> review and actually also easier
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:08 AM, L. D. Pinney wrote:
> DAVE :
>
> WILL YOU PLEASE STOP YOUR FSCKin' CROSS POSTING ???
I did not start the cross-post in this case.
> This is UNRELATED to the OpenWrt / LEDE DEV mailing list...as the change has
> been merged.
Interop with
> The advantage of pull requests is that author information can be
> preserved more easily. Running git format-patch results in most
> patches
> having wrong SMTP sender information due to the assumption that the
> patch author is the same person also submitting the patch.
> So in practise, this
19 matches
Mail list logo