This adds basic support for IEEE 802.11ax when requesting HW or HT
Modelist for a PHY from iwinfo. This way, applications using iwinfo can
detect HE phys.
Signed-off-by: David Bauer
---
api/nl80211.h| 38 ++
include/iwinfo.h | 8 +++-
iwinfo_cli.c
Hi,
I would like to write a libubus wrapper in C++. When looking into
ubus_method and ubus_handler_t structures I don't see a place where I
could pass a this pointer. It makes the handling of ubus calls in C++
a bit complicated.
The solution to that case would be adding a void pointer to the
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 3:28 PM Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> Upstream integrated multiple patches from Distributions and did other
> changes:
> * rp-pppoe.so was renamed to pppoe.so
> * Converted to ANSI C
>
> The following patches were applied upstream:
> * 100-debian_ip-ip_option.patch
> *
On 2/1/21 1:15 AM, Rosen Penev wrote:
Remove stime backport.
Remove static libgcc patch as upstream fixed it with
BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_STATIC_LIBGCC which defauls to off.
Remove date -k patch as it no longer applies. It's also pointless as
busybox' hwclock utility can do the same thing.
Remove
Upstream integrated multiple patches from Distributions and did other
changes:
* rp-pppoe.so was renamed to pppoe.so
* Converted to ANSI C
The following patches were applied upstream:
* 100-debian_ip-ip_option.patch
* 101-debian_close_dev_ppp.patch
* 103-debian_fix_link_pidfile.patch
*
Only small changes compared to the 2.84test3 version.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens
---
package/network/services/dnsmasq/Makefile | 6 +++---
.../patches/100-remove-old-runtime-kernel-support.patch | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 4:20 PM Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
>
> AFAIK, no. There is a per-port bit that you can set to ignore the
> errors, i.e. no violation is generated, but I am pretty sure that the
> frame is still dropped.
I just tested on my WRT1900AC v2. It seems that the CPU can receive
On Tue Feb 2, 2021 at 11:03 PM CET, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 9:22 PM Tobias Waldekranz
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Tobias, what happens if the switch receives a frame that violates ATU
> > > portvec member? Is the frame trapped to the CPU or dropped?
> >
> > The frame will be
DESCRIPTION
RsaPad_PSS in wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in wolfSSL before 4.6.0 has an out-of-bounds
write for certain relationships between key size and digest size. The issue is
marked as critical with CVSS score of 9.8 (10 is most severe)[0].
wolfSSL library is provided as `libwolfssl24` package in
