Would it be possible to merge this patch in the svn since otherwise
it is not possible to build openwrt for x86.
Bye
R.
- Roberto Riggio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I apologize for the mess. I just wanted to send a patch compliant
with
your guidelines (the previous one was embedded in a
Hi Roberto,
Le jeudi 27 mars 2008, Roberto Riggio a écrit :
Would it be possible to merge this patch in the svn since otherwise
it is not possible to build openwrt for x86.
Applied in [10672]. Thanks !
--
Best regards, Florian Fainelli
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openwrt.org
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
i'm not sure why this patch wouldn't apply cleanly. it applies
perfectly cleanly against the latest git tree with patchlevel 1 on my
system. can anyone else verify this? thanks.
package/fuse/Makefile|4
a while back, i proposed having the build check if any of the
already-installed host tools were suitable so that you didn't have to
download and build them -- sed being the perfect example since
almost everyone has a relatively recent sed on their system. has
anyone done anything along those
is there any inherent difficulty in bumping up the software versions
of the toolchain components? say, binutils to 2.18 and gcc to 4.2.3?
i realize you can always do that *manually* but if those values are
the *defaults*, it's more likely that people will use them and will
identify build
I am getting an automake version mismatch when compiling libsamplerate.
This worked for me:
define Build/Compile
pushd $(PKG_BUILD_DIR) aclocal automake popd
.
I can make that an official patch if you would like.
//.ichael Geddes
On 2008.03.27. 23:03:59 Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there any inherent difficulty in bumping up the software versions
of the toolchain components? say, binutils to 2.18 and gcc to 4.2.3?
i realize you can always do that *manually* but if those values are
the *defaults*,
On 2008.03.27. 23:37:47 Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Ok. Anyway the compiler gcc4.3 supports a lot new cpus (like the
coldfire) :) opening new development horizons.
Sure, as AVR32 uses gcc 4.2.3.. Some targets work better with newer
compilers, others do not. Spice
On gio, 2008-03-27 at 23:42 +0100, Imre Kaloz wrote:
On 2008.03.27. 23:37:47 Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Ok. Anyway the compiler gcc4.3 supports a lot new cpus (like the
coldfire) :) opening new development horizons.
Sure, as AVR32 uses gcc 4.2.3.. Some
