Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] lm-sensors: split out sensors-detect from rest of package
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 04:00:19PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: On 5/6/11 12:06 PM, Luka Perkov wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 05:28:43PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: Since sensors-detect isn't always needed where sensors is used, and has unexpressed dependency on perl, it might make more sense to have this be separated out... Redux with better perl dependencies. Applied in 26838 with minor changes. Tips for next time: * you forgot to bump PKG_RELEASE because PKG_VERSION stayed the same * reply to your own mails when resubmitting the patch * for small patches like this one you did not have to make 'announcement' * send patch inline More info here: https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/SubmittingPatches Thank you, Luka Unfortunately, I'm using Thunderbird which is known to mangle leading whitespace on patches... so attachments are required. Which announcement were you referring to? I was referring to this mail: https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-May/010760.html But I but did not read it carefully... It's not 'announcement' :) Luka ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Problem: Cannot satisfy the dependencies for ... during installation into image
On Fri, 06 May 2011 10:09:49 +0200 Ithamar R. Adema ithamar.ad...@team-embedded.nl wrote: On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 16:49 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: I agree that user files should take precedence over canned release files (actually, I thought this was the case?). This used to be the cause, but broken a while ago. See this[1] disucssion for previous discussion on basically the same problem. Ithamar. [1]: https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-March/010191.html Which reminds me, which target is the offending one with a per-target fstab (which I believe is wrong, unless the target can only ever possibly have a single known USB device (i.e. internal USB device only, rather than USB host port))? Also, I want to take a look at the fstab and see how it differs from the default to see if it truly a platform-specific config or just that the platform dev happens to prefer a different config. If it's a true target-specific one then the thing to do is modify the block-mount makefile to use a different config depending on the target. If not then I need to discuss the issue with the platform maintainer. -- erno hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it responds to ping, it works completely, I just can't figure out where in my apartment it is. GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C http://gnupg.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] github's clone
Hello there I assume the main repo is the svn one ? If so then is the https://github.com/mirrors/openwrt somewhat oficially synced with the svn one ? best regards -- cyryl ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] github's clone
AFAIK it is synced with nbd git - by github team. It would be nice to have there packages also. Maxim 2011/5/7 Cyryl Płotnicki-Chudyk cy...@cyplo.net: Hello there I assume the main repo is the svn one ? If so then is the https://github.com/mirrors/openwrt somewhat oficially synced with the svn one ? best regards -- cyryl ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] github's clone
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Maxim Osipov maxim.osi...@gmail.com wrote: AFAIK it is synced with nbd git - by github team. It would be nice to have there packages also. Maxim If I fork there and create some changes - is there a possibility of just issuing a pull request, or the only possibility is posting a patch is via the email list? -- cyryl ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Problem: Cannot satisfy the dependencies for ... during installation into image
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 09:54 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: Which reminds me, which target is the offending one with a per-target fstab (which I believe is wrong, unless the target can only ever possibly have a single known USB device (i.e. internal USB device only, rather than USB host port))? In my case it is a target that is not (yet) in the OpenWRT repository, but looking at current trunk, I see 3 fstab's in target/linux: target/linux/xburst/base-files/etc/config/fstab target/linux/omap24xx/base-files/etc/config/fstab target/linux/s3c24xx/openmoko-gta02/base-files/etc/config/fstab Also, I want to take a look at the fstab and see how it differs from the default to see if it truly a platform-specific config or just that the platform dev happens to prefer a different config. The list above there are at least 2 different fstabs, as openmoko and xburst onces seem to be the same. If it's a true target-specific one then the thing to do is modify the block-mount makefile to use a different config depending on the target. If not then I need to discuss the issue with the platform maintainer. I have a couple of use cases on different targets where fstab is used for mount points which aren't internal. They are not only target specific, but *product* specific. In the end, I think this is not just a block-mount problem but a generic problem with device profiles having custom configuration. I know in most cases this gets solved by using uci-defaults to reconfigure, but in my case it is a target running from ramdisk, so every boot is a first boot ;-) The alternative of the files/ directory in the WRT buildroot is IMHO a very bad solution for this, as it will be used regardless of which target or profile you build for, and at least I tend to have one build tree for multiple targets/profiles. I would like a hook in the profiles to do post-package-install configuration on the rootfs, if it isn't there already. I have to admit I haven't found time yet to look more closely at this. Regards, Ithamar. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] tcp_wrappers: upstream patch for supporting n.n.n.n/len notation
Actually, it needs to return the prefix in network byte order... htonl() and
ntohl() tend to be identical.
Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com
Index: feeds/packages/libs/tcp_wrappers/patches/004-ipv4_prefix.patch
===
--- feeds/packages/libs/tcp_wrappers/patches/004-ipv4_prefix.patch
(revision 0)
+++ feeds/packages/libs/tcp_wrappers/patches/004-ipv4_prefix.patch
(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+--- tcp_wrappers_7.6/hosts_access.5.orig 2011-05-05 22:34:39.0
-0600
tcp_wrappers_7.6/hosts_access.52011-05-05 22:39:43.0 -0600
+@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ bitwise AND of the address and the `mask
+ pattern `131.155.72.0/255.255.254.0' matches every address in the
+ range `131.155.72.0' through `131.155.73.255'.
+ .IP \(bu
++An expression of the form `n.n.n.n/m\' is interpreted as a
++`net/prefixlen\' pair, as below, for IPv4 addresses.
++.IP \(bu
+ A string that begins with a `/' character is treated as a file
+ name. A host name or address is matched if it matches any host name
+ or address pattern listed in the named file. The file format is
+--- tcp_wrappers_7.6/tcpd.h.orig 2011-05-05 22:34:39.0 -0600
tcp_wrappers_7.6/tcpd.h2011-05-05 22:40:14.0 -0600
+@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ extern void refuse __P((struct request_i
+ extern char *xgets __P((char *, int, FILE *));/* fgets() on steroids
*/
+ extern char *split_at __P((char *, int)); /* strchr() and split */
+ extern unsigned long dot_quad_addr __P((char *)); /* restricted inet_addr() */
++extern unsigned long prefix_to_netmask __P((char *)); /* 0-32 prefix length */
+
+ /* Global variables. */
+
+--- tcp_wrappers_7.6/misc.c.orig 1996-02-11 09:01:30.0 -0700
tcp_wrappers_7.6/misc.c2011-05-05 22:41:49.0 -0600
+@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ static char sccsic[] = @(#) misc.c 1.2
+ #include arpa/inet.h
+ #include stdio.h
+ #include string.h
++#include ctype.h
++#include stdlib.h
+
+ #include tcpd.h
+
+@@ -85,3 +87,22 @@ char *str;
+ }
+ return (runs == 4 ? inet_addr(str) : INADDR_NONE);
+ }
++
++/* prefix_to_netmask - convert prefix (0-32) to netmask */
++
++unsigned long prefix_to_netmask(str)
++char *str;
++{
++unsigned long prefix;
++char *endptr;
++
++if (!isdigit(str[0]))
++ return INADDR_NONE;
++
++prefix = strtoul(str, endptr, 10);
++if ((endptr == str) || (*endptr != '\0') || (prefix 32))
++ return INADDR_NONE;
++
++return htonl(~0UL (32 - prefix));
++}
++
+--- tcp_wrappers_7.6/hosts_access.c.orig 2011-05-05 22:34:39.0
-0600
tcp_wrappers_7.6/hosts_access.c2011-05-05 22:45:09.0 -0600
+@@ -345,7 +345,12 @@ char *string;
+ if ((addr = dot_quad_addr(string)) == INADDR_NONE)
+ return (NO);
+ if ((net = dot_quad_addr(net_tok)) == INADDR_NONE
+- || (mask = dot_quad_addr(mask_tok)) == INADDR_NONE) {
++ || ((mask = dot_quad_addr(mask_tok)) == INADDR_NONE
++ strcmp(mask_tok, 255.255.255.255)
++ (mask = prefix_to_netmask(mask_tok)) == INADDR_NONE
++ strcmp(mask_tok, 32))) {
++ /* 255.255.255.255 == INADDR_NONE, separate check needed. TJ. */
++ /* 32 == INADDR_NONE, separate check needed. philipp */
+ tcpd_warn(bad net/mask expression: %s/%s, net_tok, mask_tok);
+ return (NO);/* not tcpd_jump() */
+ }
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] generic: Include IPv6 support into the kernel for 2.6.38+
Hi, On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:04:04PM -0600, so...@guug.org wrote: Do not enforce IPv6! Last time I enforce it on end users was a mess, really, I was an IPv6 enthusiast until I had to step back and turn it off. DJ Bernstein and others were plain right: http://weblog.kernelcode.com/2010/02/25/ipv6-is-a-failure-stop-wasting-everyones-time/ Unless someone finds a magic lantern that has a few more billion IPv4 addresses in it, IPv6 is all we have. Looking at the global IPv6 routing table, ISPs seem to have finally noticed as well... (And DJB is part of the problem, not helping with any solution at all) gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de pgpx5yqY6yr56.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add libFTDI
Adds libfti - a C-library to interface FTDI USB-serial-chips.
Package may need improvement, source libftdi also provides a C++ binding
which is not getting installed with this package yet.
- it's my first, please let me know things done wrong, I might have
some more patches the next days/weeks ;)
Signed-off-by: Michael Markstaller m...@elabnet.de
Index: feeds/packages/libs/libftdi/Makefile
===
--- feeds/packages/libs/libftdi/Makefile(Revision 0)
+++ feeds/packages/libs/libftdi/Makefile(Revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2011 OpenWrt.org
+#
+# This is free software, licensed under the GNU General Public License v2.
+# See /LICENSE for more information.
+#
+
+include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk
+
+PKG_NAME:=libftdi
+PKG_VERSION:=0.18
+PKG_RELEASE:=1
+
+PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.gz
+PKG_SOURCE_URL:=http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi/download/
+PKG_MD5SUM:=916f65fa68d154621fc0cf1f405f2726
+
+PKG_INSTALL:=1
+
+include $(INCLUDE_DIR)/package.mk
+
+define Package/libftdi
+ SECTION:=libs
+ CATEGORY:=Libraries
+ TITLE:=library to talk to FTDI chips
+ URL:=http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi/
+endef
+
+define Package/libftdi/description
+ libFTDI - FTDI USB driver with bitbang mode
+ libFTDI is an open source library to talk to FTDI chips: FT232BM, FT245BM,
FT2232C, FT2232H, FT4232H, FT2232D and FT245R, including the popular bitbang
mode.
+ The library is linked with your program in userspace, no kernel driver
required.
+endef
+
+define Build/InstallDev
+ $(INSTALL_DIR) $(1)/usr/include/
+ $(CP) $(PKG_INSTALL_DIR)/usr/include/ftdi.h $(1)/usr/include/
+ $(INSTALL_DIR) $(1)/usr/lib
+ $(CP) $(PKG_INSTALL_DIR)/usr/lib/libftdi.{a,so} $(1)/usr/lib/
+ $(CP) $(PKG_INSTALL_DIR)/usr/lib/libftdi.so* $(1)/usr/lib/
+endef
+
+define Package/libftdi/install
+ $(INSTALL_DIR) $(1)/usr/lib
+ $(CP) $(PKG_INSTALL_DIR)/usr/lib/libftdi.so.* $(1)/usr/lib/
+endef
+
+$(eval $(call BuildPackage,libftdi))
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Gigaset SX763
Hello! I'm trying to set up openwrt on this router, it is based on Lantiq Xway Danube Soc ( PSB50702 E), and manufactured by Sagem(previously by Siemens). Wiki page is here http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/gigaset/sx76x I already managed to boot openwrt on it, but I cannot get USB working, because there is no power on the port (DISCONNECTED PORT). It was possible to get power on old ifxmips target by modifying GPIO addresses in usb_vbus_enable function, but since that is now changed I dunno how to make it work on a new one. ( I asked that on forums https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=134415#p134415 ) I also looked up at those arcadyan board configs, and some of them have _EBU addess and _USB pin defined. I know that on this router usb power is on gpio 29( gpl source says that ), and that irq at dwc_otg driver in original fw is 54, but I dunno which address should go to EBU ( if any). Also this board doesn't have wlan eeprom, instead it is read by a wlan driver from a file inside fw. If someone has some answers on how to modify current ath5k driver, would like to know. Thanx Openwrt log: http://pastebin.com/btkGDSXu ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Gigaset SX763
Al 07/05/11 23:23, En/na Andrej Vlašić ha escrit: I also looked up at those arcadyan board configs, and some of them have _EBU addess and _USB pin defined. I know that on this router usb power is on gpio 29( gpl source says that ) So you'll have to define it for your board in the call to xway_register_dwc (mach-arv45xx.c). Also this board doesn't have wlan eeprom, instead it is read by a wlan driver from a file inside fw. If someone has some answers on how to modify current ath5k driver, would like to know. The code in mach-arv45xx.c (arv45xx_register_ath5k) should already take care of that. Bye -- Luca ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
