[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] shellfm: libao support

2011-10-03 Thread christoph . gysin
From: Christoph Gysin christoph.gy...@gmail.com - remove madplay dependency - enable libao support (we already depend on it) - disable external command in default configuration - add symlink for .libao To configure libao, the library looks for a .libao configuration file in the users home

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] support for make xconfig

2011-10-03 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hello, On Thursday 23 June 2011 10:42:31 Emmanuel Deloget wrote: This patchset brings back the support for the xconfig (and the corresponding kernel_xconfig) top-level targets. Since these targets depends on qt3 (and more precisely the development packages of qt3), some effort has been spent

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] support for make xconfig

2011-10-03 Thread Emmanuel Deloget
Le 03/10/2011 15:32, Florian Fainelli a écrit : Hello, Hi Florian, On Thursday 23 June 2011 10:42:31 Emmanuel Deloget wrote: This patchset brings back the support for the xconfig (and the corresponding kernel_xconfig) top-level targets. Since these targets depends on qt3 (and more precisely

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] support for make xconfig

2011-10-03 Thread Emmanuel Deloget
Le 03/10/2011 15:32, Florian Fainelli a écrit : Hello, On Thursday 23 June 2011 10:42:31 Emmanuel Deloget wrote: snip Patch 1/4 to 3/4 in the series are necessary to add support for make xconfig. Patch 4/4 will add support for make kernel_xconfig only if Patch 3/4 has been applied (both patch

[OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing me

2011-10-03 Thread David Newall
Hello. I'm new to this list. I've been looking at IPv6 modems for a few months; found OpenWRT pretty quickly and liked it more than the alternatives. Fine job you all are doing. I'm using a DG834 (rev 1) and it works rather nicely, even if ADSL throughput seems low. I had no problem

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-10-03 Thread Luka Perkov
Hi, On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 01:52:53PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: On Monday 05 September 2011 18:44:39 Michael Büsch wrote: On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:11:43 +0200 Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote: I am still wondering how enabling preempt could possibly workaround/hide an