On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Gui Iribarren wrote:
On 17/07/14 21:03, David Lang wrote:
I know that IPv6 designers pine for the good old days of the Internet
when no security was needed.
But the reality is that hackers and worms have shown that leaving
systems exposed to the Internet is just a Bad
by the way, link local addresses are not going to be used for these devices,
because they will all have some 'cloud' feature that will require they have a
way to phone home.
David Lang
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, David Lang wrote:
Every IPv4 home router I have seen defaults to 'block all
Hi Karl,
On July 17, 2014 11:40:52 PM CEST, Karl P ka...@tweak.net.au wrote:
On 07/17/2014 08:26 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
I argue that people unable to change the router settings are
better of with all unsolicited inbound traffic disabled.
I've tried to avoid weighing in on this,
Hello,
Is there any convenient way to clone Barrier Breaker rc1 branch?
Is it as simple as cloning trunk branch with `git clone
git://git.openwrt.org/openwrt.git`?
Does BB-rc1 have a different branch name, for example
barrier-breaker.git or similar?
Thanks in advance.
smime.p7s
Description:
From: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
[s...@open-mesh.com: Rebased]
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann s...@open-mesh.com
---
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh | 3 +++
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds | 5
From: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
[s...@open-mesh.com: Rebased]
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann s...@open-mesh.com
---
scripts/om-fwupgradecfg-gen.sh | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
[s...@open-mesh.com: Rebased]
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann s...@open-mesh.com
---
package/kernel/om-watchdog/files/om-watchdog.init | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git
From: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
[s...@open-mesh.com: Rebased]
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann s...@open-mesh.com
---
target/linux/ar71xx/config-3.10| 1 +
.../linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-om5p.c | 122
From: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
[s...@open-mesh.com: Rebased]
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann s...@open-mesh.com
---
target/linux/ar71xx/generic/profiles/openmesh.mk | 11 +++
target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile | 3 ++-
From: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
[s...@open-mesh.com: Rebased]
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann s...@open-mesh.com
---
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/openmesh.sh | 7 ++-
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh |
From: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner ma...@open-mesh.com
[s...@open-mesh.com: Rebased]
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann s...@open-mesh.com
---
package/boot/uboot-envtools/files/ar71xx | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
On 18/07/14 04:48, Alive wrote:
Hello,
Is there any convenient way to clone Barrier Breaker rc1 branch?
Is it as simple as cloning trunk branch with `git clone
git://git.openwrt.org/openwrt.git`?
Does BB-rc1 have a different branch name, for example
barrier-breaker.git or similar?
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:20:09AM +0200, Steven Barth wrote:
Regarding firewalling: I understand and support your point for
end-to-end connectivity though there are still quite a few people
(including myself) who have reservations about the security
implications.
This discussion
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:07:57PM -0400, Soren Harward wrote:
the worst case scenario is that the user's machine gets compromised.
This is an extreme likely case, but it will not happen by a network
based attack. Compromises these days on end hosts happen due to garbage
the users click
Le jeudi 17 juillet 2014 à 17:03 -0700, David Lang a écrit :
But the reality is that hackers and worms have shown that leaving systems
exposed to the Internet is just a Bad Idea.
Do you mean, all the hackers and worms we see today despite all these
systems being behind blocking firewalls and
Hi Gui, hi list,
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juli 2014 um 05:56 Uhr
Von: Gui Iribarren g...@altermundi.net
An: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Betreff: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IPv6 firewall and Port Control Protocol (Was:
Barrier Breaker 14.07-rc1)
On 17/07/14 21:59, Fernando Frediani wrote:
Perfect
mtd: allow partial block erase
This fixes error erasing partial mtd partition which does not start on
eraseblock boundary and allows using fconfig to configure redboot on
devices such as the Gateworks Cambria.
fixed in all kernels and folded in initial mtd-partial_eraseblock_write.patch
Maciej
Gert Doering wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:20:09AM +0200, Steven Barth wrote:
Regarding firewalling: I understand and support your point for
end-to-end connectivity though there are still quite a few people
(including myself) who have reservations about the security
implications.
This
On 17/07/2014 10:55, Bruno Randolf wrote:
I volunteer to maintain au1000. The only devices I have are MTX-1
though, but I believe there are not many other au1000 boards out in
the wild anyways.
good
I don't know how to fix the sysupgrade issue. Basically the name
used in AA was wrong
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Benjamin Cama wrote:
Le jeudi 17 juillet 2014 à 17:03 -0700, David Lang a écrit :
But the reality is that hackers and worms have shown that leaving systems
exposed to the Internet is just a Bad Idea.
Do you mean, all the hackers and worms we see today despite all these
Hello friends,
S... it seems everybody ran out of ideas concerning this b44 thing?
Of course I know I can just buy another new TL-WDR4300 (that's easy) if
I just need something proven stable right now, but, well, it's kind of
shamefull surrender... I had WL-500* running Kamikaze for years
On 18 July 2014 22:01, Nikolai Zhubr n-a-zh...@yandex.ru wrote:
(Maybe even
abandoning brcm47xx target in upcoming releases would be better, as long as
noone is able to fix it as of yet...)
I understand you try to make a pressure, but it really doesn't help
and just annoys developers. Please
18.07.2014 23:55, Rafał Miłecki:
[...]
I understand you try to make a pressure, but it really doesn't help
and just annoys developers. Please avoid that.
I'm currently hardly working on b43 now, trying to fix a lot of issues
in it. That's pretty important too. Be more patient, we have lifes,
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:21:56 -0700, Bill wrote:
Gert Doering wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:20:09AM +0200, Steven Barth wrote:
Regarding firewalling: I understand and support your point for
end-to-end connectivity though there are still quite a few people
(including myself) who have
From: L. D. Pinney ldpin...@gmail.com
This patch adds support for the Kingston Mobilelite Wireless (MLW-221)
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/kingston/mlw221
Signed-off-by: L. D. Pinney ldpin...@gmail.com
---
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/diag.sh
Hi
On Saturday 19 July 2014, David Lang wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:21:56 -0700, Bill wrote:
Gert Doering wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:20:09AM +0200, Steven Barth wrote:
[...]
P.S. No, my printer is not v6-ready, either, but let's assume there
are some that are...
If you're
Oops, I guess I was too verbose with including the whole Developer's
Certificate.
I assume you've all been busy with the new BB rc, but have you had any
chance to test it out?
Is there anything I can help with for this patch?
Quoting John Crispin j...@phrozen.org:
...
apart from that it
From: L. D. Pinney ldpin...@gmail.com
This patch adds support for the Kingston Mobilelite Wireless (MLW-221)
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/kingston/mlw221
Signed-off-by: L. D. Pinney ldpin...@gmail.com
---
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/diag.sh
28 matches
Mail list logo
