Am 30.10.2014 um 03:36 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
Le 28/10/2014 11:46, Heiner Kallweit a écrit :
After a little more thinking about it and looking at the code I basically
have two questions:
1.
Is it actually needed to exclude certain phy's in ar8xxx_phy_config_aneg?
(At least for AR8327 it
---
target/linux/lantiq/xrx200/profiles/arv.mk |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/lantiq/xrx200/profiles/arv.mk
b/target/linux/lantiq/xrx200/profiles/arv.mk
index 821884c..9dd8daa 100644
--- a/target/linux/lantiq/xrx200/profiles/arv.mk
+++
---
target/linux/lantiq/xrx200/profiles/arv.mk |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/lantiq/xrx200/profiles/arv.mk
b/target/linux/lantiq/xrx200/profiles/arv.mk
index 821884c..9dd8daa 100644
--- a/target/linux/lantiq/xrx200/profiles/arv.mk
+++
Hey,
Thanks to everybody involved! Does this also solve the issue discussed
at [1] with TCP connections failing when VLAN is disabled?
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org/msg19870.html
--
Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software!
On 30/10/2014 08:49, Paul Fertser wrote:
Hey,
Thanks to everybody involved! Does this also solve the issue discussed
at [1] with TCP connections failing when VLAN is disabled?
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org/msg19870.html
probably this bugfix -
I had to use a VDSL-only tone-setup to get show-time.
Handle this in uci by checking if annex is unset.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dan...@makrotopia.org
---
package/network/config/ltq-vdsl-app/files/dsl_control | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
John Crispin blo...@openwrt.org writes:
On 30/10/2014 08:49, Paul Fertser wrote:
Thanks to everybody involved! Does this also solve the issue discussed
at [1] with TCP connections failing when VLAN is disabled?
[1]
On 30/10/2014 10:38, Paul Fertser wrote:
John Crispin blo...@openwrt.org writes:
On 30/10/2014 08:49, Paul Fertser wrote:
Thanks to everybody involved! Does this also solve the issue
discussed at [1] with TCP connections failing when VLAN is
disabled?
[1]
On 30/10/2014 11:00, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 30 October 2014 04:01, Mingyu Li igv...@gmail.com wrote:
on rt2880 i also use rt-n15. the performance on rt2880 seeks unstable.
sometime low. sometime high. i also don't know why.
others target are more stable. so the maximum is 12x i got.
by
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 01:49:13PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Well, I don't think it was public enough then. The 3.16 patches have
been around for quite some time, some people actually tested it, sent
some feedbacks, we fixed some issues, before getting it merged.
I don't think this is
Hi Sami,
Using John's version:
config interface 'wan'
option proto 'wwan'
option apn 'opengate'
# option device '/dev/cdc-wdm0' (with or without commenting this)
Does absolutely nothing, nothing in logread...
However now when using
config interface 'wan'
Hi John,
thanks for the straight answers.
Interpreting what you just wrote and what I already see from a technical
point of view, I get the following picture:
The VDSL firmware blob needs to match the driver as Lantiq apparently
got several variants depending on who is using it downstream.
mtd fixtrk now finds the correct partition but unfortunately in my setup
(no rootfs and no lzma-loader) it now bricks my router. I will try and
find a cure and post a patch.
Stephen Parry
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
I presume this will need to be a patch that creates a numbered patch in
either:
target/linux/generic/patches-3.14
or:
target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-3.14
Any guidance please on which and what number to use?
Is the patch you sent me a patch against 3.18?
Thanks
Stephen
On 29/10/14 17:42,
On 30 October 2014 13:56, Stephen G. Parry sgpa...@mainscreen.com wrote:
I presume this will need to be a patch that creates a numbered patch in
either:
target/linux/generic/patches-3.14
or:
target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-3.14
Any guidance please on which and what number to use?
You
Merged with some modifications.
Thanks.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
i checkout the latest code and rebuild for rt-n15
only test 3 times lan to wan tcp performance 60 seconds one thread
netperf version 2.6.0
116.33, 116.20, 102.84 (10^6bits/sec)
iperf 2.0.5
120, 116, 113 (Mbits/sec)
iperf 3.0.7
113, 124, 121 (Mbits/sec)
2014-10-30 18:35 GMT+08:00 Paul Fertser
Hi,
While Running tests in an openwrt based IP gateway, we noticed a dns problem
running openwrt in a gateway.
When DNS proxy ( dnsmasq) forward the DNS reply, the Answer of section was
extracted.
Please refer to the following tests for the problem description.
192.168.42.135
On 30 October 2014 16:20, Mingyu Li igv...@gmail.com wrote:
i checkout the latest code and rebuild for rt-n15
only test 3 times lan to wan tcp performance 60 seconds one thread
netperf version 2.6.0
116.33, 116.20, 102.84 (10^6bits/sec)
iperf 2.0.5
120, 116, 113 (Mbits/sec)
iperf 3.0.7
Am 30.10.2014 um 07:22 schrieb Heiner Kallweit:
Am 30.10.2014 um 03:36 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
Le 28/10/2014 11:46, Heiner Kallweit a écrit :
After a little more thinking about it and looking at the code I basically
have two questions:
1.
Is it actually needed to exclude certain phy's in
okay:
config interface 'wan'
option ifname 'wwan0'
option proto 'ncm'
option apn 'opengate'
option device '/dev/cdc-wdm0'
Thu Oct 30 21:06:18 2014 daemon.notice netifd: wan (2446): comgt
21:06:18 - -- Error Report --
Thu Oct 30 21:06:18 2014 daemon.notice netifd:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:04:17PM +0200, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 30 October 2014 16:20, Mingyu Li igv...@gmail.com wrote:
i checkout the latest code and rebuild for rt-n15
only test 3 times lan to wan tcp performance 60 seconds one thread
netperf version 2.6.0
116.33, 116.20, 102.84
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
The wiki says [0] that for Ubnt NS Loco M5 (build in the year 2014)
someone has to use the **xw** firmware like
*openwrt-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-nano-m-xw-squashfs-factory.bin*.
But this do not work for my model with Test date: 01/24/14, which
came
Using a redirect to a non-empty mtd partition will not erase the
blocks prior to writing to them resulting in broken dsl_fw.
Fix this by piping to mtd write - /dev/mtdX instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dan...@makrotopia.org
---
package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl-fw/src/vdsl_fw_install.sh | 2 +-
24 matches
Mail list logo
