Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] protobuf broken in BB

2014-11-06 Thread obconseil
Le 05/11/2014 22:43, Guillaume Déflache a écrit : Fine, but that's not the problem as I said before (see the very 1st quoted text in this message): *installing protoc at the right location* (that is .../build_dir/host/bin/protoc IIRC) is the problem. I checked that with our pre-BB snapshot

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Fixed dependencies in netfilter modules introduced with 3.18 kernel

2014-11-06 Thread Alexey N. Vinogradov
Building current trunk with 3.18 kernel fired some errors like 'missed dependancy of module XXX from library kmod_YYY.ko'. These patch fixes 3 of such issues which are critical to have a successful build. diff --git a/include/netfilter.mk b/include/netfilter.mk index 72c66d9..9c28a68 100644 ---

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/4] ubinize-image: Change the rootfs to a static volume

2014-11-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:16:13AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi Daniel, On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:37:18PM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote: Hi Maxime, On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:59:27PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: On boards with large page size, the rootfs we generate might end up using

[OpenWrt-Devel] q: lantiq nor and two chip

2014-11-06 Thread Eddi De Pieri
VGV7519 board have two chip at 0xb000 and 0xb4000 Which is the correct syntax? compatible = lantiq,nor; bank-width = 2; reg = 0 0x0 0x80 1 0x0 0x80; or compatible = lantiq,nor; bank-width = 2; reg = 0 0x0 0x80, 1 0x0 0x80; Does lantiq,nor support this

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Fixed dependencies in netfilter modules introduced with 3.18 kernel

2014-11-06 Thread Dirk Neukirchen
Your patch is broken. Its missing the 3rd line after the 3rd chunk where you added +$(eval $(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_MASQUERADE, $(P_V4)nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4, ge 3.18.0)) ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Fixed dependencies in netfilter modules introduced with 3.18 kernel

2014-11-06 Thread Alexey N. Vinogradov
Your patch is broken. Its missing the 3rd line after the 3rd chunk where you added +$(eval $(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_MASQUERADE, $(P_V4)nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4, ge 3.18.0)) Yes, I see. And also I'd send it in process of reading 'SubmittingPatches' wiki (this is my first

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [generic] Fixed dependencies in netfilter modules introduced with 3.18 kernel

2014-11-06 Thread Alexey N. Vinogradov
From: Alexey N Vinogradov a.n.vinogra...@gmail.com Building current trunk with 3.18 kernel fired some errors like 'missed dependancy of module XXX from library kmod_YYY.ko'. These patch fixes 3 of such issues which are critical to have a successful build. Signed-off-by: Alexey N Vinogradov

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] bcm53xx: image: fixed Makefile to avoid broken build entered with last include/image.mk changes

2014-11-06 Thread Alexey N. Vinogradov
The last changes in image.mk changed build order and targets. Now squashfs is not build 'always', and even if it is defined in the config, it will be built after Image/Build/Initramfs. So, the last will fail (because root.squashfs is reffered in ubinize.cfg). Note that with this patch you still

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] bcm53xx: image: changed manual jffs2 marking to general rule

2014-11-06 Thread Alexey N. Vinogradov
Signed-off-by: Alexey N Vinogradov a.n.vinogra...@gmail.com --- diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx/image/Makefile b/target/linux/bcm53xx/image/Makefile index b2fafd9..599af4e 100644 --- a/target/linux/bcm53xx/image/Makefile +++ b/target/linux/bcm53xx/image/Makefile @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ include

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] image: default block size for squashfs

2014-11-06 Thread Alexey N. Vinogradov
Sometimes squashfs is necessary for other targets (say, initramfs). In this case it may not be explicitly checked in the config, and squash fs block size will not be explicitly defined. This patch will set this value to 256k in such case. Signed-off-by: Alexey N Vinogradov