Included you'll find a patch to bump ipset to version 6.24. This
version supports the ip,fwmark set, which is needed for mwan3 1.6.
Signed-off-by: Jeroen Louwes jeroen.lou...@gmail.com
---
diff --git a/package/network/utils/ipset/Makefile
b/package/network/utils/ipset/Makefile
index
Hi John,
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:29:45PM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
i tried this before and it did not work
I must admit that I didn't see that magic.../magic in the
code of the extractor... (though this seems to be fine, changing
MAGIC or MAGIC_SZ results in LZMA decompression errors which
---
CMakeLists.txt |4
plug/hotplug.c |2 +-
service/validate.c |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
index 5414677..0296735 100644
--- a/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ SET(SOURCES
Signed-off-by: Sergey Ryazanov ryazanov@gmail.com
---
.../patches/331-ath5k-channel-change-fix.patch | 145 +
1 file changed, 145 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
package/kernel/mac80211/patches/331-ath5k-channel-change-fix.patch
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Sergey Ryazanov ryazanov@gmail.com
---
.../patches/332-ath5k-fix-reset-race.patch | 104 +
1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
package/kernel/mac80211/patches/332-ath5k-fix-reset-race.patch
diff --git
Hi,
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wants to follow you.
** Is drasko.drasko...@gmail.com you friend? **
If Yes please follow the link below:
On Sat, 2015-02-28 at 23:07 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to make progress on getting the Netgear R8000 to work.
Basically it's a BCM4799 but with a BCM53012 switch rather than the
usual BCM53011 (among other differences).
Obviously that's a BCM4709.
I have a number of
Couple of patches for the reset code path to address the
invalid hw_rix warning and to make reset more robust.
Sergey Ryazanov (2):
ath5k: channel change fix
ath5k: fix reset race
.../patches/331-ath5k-channel-change-fix.patch | 145 +
Hi,
the same question was already discussed on 2008-01, but it seems to me,
that some iterim steps are no more necessary... I guess that there has
been some improvements made in the last 7 years :-) Therefore, I would
thankful for a confirmation of my assumption.
Actually I do the following:
1.
On 03/03/2015 12:27, Claudio Thomas wrote:
Hi,
the same question was already discussed on 2008-01, but it seems to me,
that some iterim steps are no more necessary... I guess that there has
been some improvements made in the last 7 years :-) Therefore, I would
thankful for a confirmation
10 matches
Mail list logo
